Forum:The Master - 1 article: Difference between revisions
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
: Well, some of the above have issues: ''We can't call [[The Master (Bruce)]] as The Master (Morphant), because another story calls it a Deathworm. (see [[Talk:The Master (Bruce)]]) we should call the Unit years one Original, for it could be confused with the Koschei one. It may be a bit weird sounding, but I might suggest [[The Master (Thirteenth life)]], or maybe even [[Thirteenth Master]]... I dont think we should call a first master's page [[The Master (Koschei)]], because [[The Master (UNIT years)]] also went by this title. I do support the creation of a page for the original Master, though. ''[[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 00:40, January 10, 2012 (UTC) | : Well, some of the above have issues: ''We can't call [[The Master (Bruce)]] as The Master (Morphant), because another story calls it a Deathworm. (see [[Talk:The Master (Bruce)]]) we should call the Unit years one Original, for it could be confused with the Koschei one. It may be a bit weird sounding, but I might suggest [[The Master (Thirteenth life)]], or maybe even [[Thirteenth Master]]... I dont think we should call a first master's page [[The Master (Koschei)]], because [[The Master (UNIT years)]] also went by this title. I do support the creation of a page for the original Master, though. ''[[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 00:40, January 10, 2012 (UTC) | ||
== Reminder == | |||
By way of reminder, we do have agreement dating back to 2010 to put all the Master pages onto a single page called "the Master". ''This'' discussion was merely started to figure out ''how'' to do the '''redirects'''. Since we've gone a long while without implementation, I just wanted to give people a week from the following time stamp to put forward any new ideas about this process before it's done. Two years is long enough to linger on a decision, people. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">21:39: Sun 15 Jul 2012 </span> |
Revision as of 21:39, 15 July 2012
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
This is a revisit of Forum:The Master, where the discussion had reached a conclusion but we hadn't quite gotten to an action point, so I thought I revisit was in order to get this settled and done.
But as we've recently had another instance of a user creating another Master article I felt we needed to revisit this again and get a decision.
As was surmised in 2008 and again during our Talk:The Master#Main image and the template discussion concerning the image for the article there are fewer Master incarnations than we think.
I'm still in favour of rolling all the articles back into 1 main article. I think this would help with clarity and editing and stop people from trying to create extra Master articles. --Tangerineduel / talk 16:41, November 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Swiftly seconded.
- The Master is unlike other Time Lords in that we don't have narrative names for the various incarnations. And the names we've chosen are completely random. There's not an easy way to make the character obey T:ONE NAME, the relevant policy, because it requires the use of the first story in which the character appeared. This disambiguation would be highly ambiguous for the Master, since The Master (Utopia), The Master (Doctor Who), and The Master (Keeper of Traken) all refer to more than one incarnation.
- Thus, as a purely disambiguational question, I think the single most sensible thing to do is to put it all on one page.
- Your still left, however, with finding a way to talk about the character. There are times where you're going to want to specify a particular incarnation, so redirects will inevitably be created to particular parts of the article. So you still need some name you can call these guys that makes sense. I think we could "pull a T:ROMANA" and slightly fudge our in-universe-only name rule. To me, the easiest thing to do would be to:
- Put all the info on The Master
- Create redirects to sections of The Master
- These redirects should use common-sense names, in the same way that we have Romana I and Romana II, despite the lack of narrative evidence for those names. Obviously we can't use numbers for the the various Masters, but we can just use the actor or company name.
- So you'd end up with the following redirects:
- The Master (Delgado)
- The Master (Ainley)
- The Master (BFA)
- The Master (DWM)
- The Master (Roberts)
- The Master (Jacobi) (and since Shalka isn't in canon, this isn't, practically, ambiguous)
- The Master (Simm)
- That way, you have a naming system that makes some kind of sense, but you can easily hide the out-of-universe nomenclature. Being redirects, no pages will ever bear these actors' names, but editors and readers can use a system that's far more straightforward than what we have.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">18:23: Tue 15 Nov 2011
- Alrighty. I think the simplest way is do all this is to copy and integrate the information from the various articles into the one Master article.
- I don't think it's practical to try and merge the histories of the various articles. It is possible to do (I think), it would involve merging two and two and so on. I think it's doable, but it would leave us with a long and fairly convoluted history for the Master article because all the the 7 Master articles' histories would end up merged. --Tangerineduel / talk 17:01, November 29, 2011 (UTC)
Added by Sinefirt
- Hughes: The Master (Koschei)
- Delgado/Pratt/Beevers: The Master (Original)
- Ainley: The Master (Tremas)
- Rathbone: The Master (Virgin)
- Beevers: The Master (Big Finish)
- Roberts/Glory: The Master (Morphant)
- Jacobi: The Master (Yana)
- Simms: The Master (Saxon)
- Well, some of the above have issues: We can't call The Master (Bruce) as The Master (Morphant), because another story calls it a Deathworm. (see Talk:The Master (Bruce)) we should call the Unit years one Original, for it could be confused with the Koschei one. It may be a bit weird sounding, but I might suggest The Master (Thirteenth life), or maybe even Thirteenth Master... I dont think we should call a first master's page The Master (Koschei), because The Master (UNIT years) also went by this title. I do support the creation of a page for the original Master, though. OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 00:40, January 10, 2012 (UTC)
Reminder
By way of reminder, we do have agreement dating back to 2010 to put all the Master pages onto a single page called "the Master". This discussion was merely started to figure out how to do the redirects. Since we've gone a long while without implementation, I just wanted to give people a week from the following time stamp to put forward any new ideas about this process before it's done. Two years is long enough to linger on a decision, people.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">21:39: Sun 15 Jul 2012