Forum:Timeline sections on pages: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
We really don't need to have five or six different timelines for characters in a story, when it is obvious what story happens next for them (for example Rose timeline on Doomsdays, states her next story is Turn Left. Do we need to say this when it is so obvious?) | We really don't need to have five or six different timelines for characters in a story, when it is obvious what story happens next for them (for example Rose timeline on Doomsdays, states her next story is Turn Left. Do we need to say this when it is so obvious?) | ||
I propose we rethink the timeline section and what we include in them. I think th best way forward is to just simple include the 'main character' (i.e The Doctor, Sarah Jane, Torchwood). The only exception for this I think would ''Journey's End' and when we have all three of them on the page. | I propose we rethink the timeline section and what we include in them. I think th best way forward is to just simple include the 'main character' (i.e The Doctor, Sarah Jane, Torchwood). The only exception for this I think would ''Journey's End' and when we have all three of them on the page. {{Unsigned|Mini-mitch}} | ||
:I say get rid of the Timeline section entirely. Instead have a little box like the {{tl|discontinuity}} box that would sit in the Continuity or Notes section that says "If you'd like to see when different characters experienced this story check out the [[Forum:Timey-wimey detector]] for greater information on continuity and time placement". | :I say get rid of the Timeline section entirely. Instead have a little box like the {{tl|discontinuity}} box that would sit in the Continuity or Notes section that says "If you'd like to see when different characters experienced this story check out the [[Forum:Timey-wimey detector]] for greater information on continuity and time placement". | ||
:At least on that forum there is reasoning given for the placement of the stories, in the Timeline sections (some/few) have the reasoning for their placement but most are just added without any further information. Reading the Timeline article sections I'm often left wondering ''why'' they've been placed as they are and it's only by going to the Time-wimey detector do I actually get an answer. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 14:00, August 24, 2012 (UTC) | :At least on that forum there is reasoning given for the placement of the stories, in the Timeline sections (some/few) have the reasoning for their placement but most are just added without any further information. Reading the Timeline article sections I'm often left wondering ''why'' they've been placed as they are and it's only by going to the Time-wimey detector do I actually get an answer. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 14:00, August 24, 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:54, 24 August 2012
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
Can we decide upon a general rule for what should be included in the 'timeline' section on story articles. By this, I do not mean what type of information we should include but who we include.
If you look at Let's Kill Hitler. The timeline section on that page includes: The Doctor, Amy, Rory, River. Young Amy and Young Rory. Doomsday includes: The Doctor, Rose, Mickey, Jackie, Daleks and the Cybermen.
Are all these really that necessary? Would it not be easier just to have one timeline - which should be for the Doctor (or the main character of the story).
We really don't need to have five or six different timelines for characters in a story, when it is obvious what story happens next for them (for example Rose timeline on Doomsdays, states her next story is Turn Left. Do we need to say this when it is so obvious?)
I propose we rethink the timeline section and what we include in them. I think th best way forward is to just simple include the 'main character' (i.e The Doctor, Sarah Jane, Torchwood). The only exception for this I think would Journey's End' and when we have all three of them on the page. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mini-mitch (talk • contribs) .
- I say get rid of the Timeline section entirely. Instead have a little box like the {{discontinuity}} box that would sit in the Continuity or Notes section that says "If you'd like to see when different characters experienced this story check out the Forum:Timey-wimey detector for greater information on continuity and time placement".
- At least on that forum there is reasoning given for the placement of the stories, in the Timeline sections (some/few) have the reasoning for their placement but most are just added without any further information. Reading the Timeline article sections I'm often left wondering why they've been placed as they are and it's only by going to the Time-wimey detector do I actually get an answer. --Tangerineduel / talk 14:00, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
