User talk:91.85.160.75: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (Bot: Adding {{Please see|Can we disable visual editor please?}} <br> {{SUBST:user:CzechOut/autosig}} <span style="{{SUBST:user:CzechOut/Time}}">{{SUBST:#time:H:i: D}} {{SUBST:#time:d M Y}} </span>) |
m (No, you don't have new messages. Sorry for the false alarm.) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:As for the user's 'nasty talk coments', I'm guessing you're referring to the comments left on the IP editor who reverted the user's talk page, three times. I can see the user's point of view and understand their annoyance, reverting the user's page was perhaps not the best way to resolve the situation. The IP editor could have left another message (rather than a revert), left a message with an admin or on the article in question's talk page. | :As for the user's 'nasty talk coments', I'm guessing you're referring to the comments left on the IP editor who reverted the user's talk page, three times. I can see the user's point of view and understand their annoyance, reverting the user's page was perhaps not the best way to resolve the situation. The IP editor could have left another message (rather than a revert), left a message with an admin or on the article in question's talk page. | ||
:Additionally the reverting was probably viewed by the user as vandalism of their talk page, each user's talk page is for communication with others users, the edit history and control over that should rest with the user in question, I can see how the user in question viewed it as a violation of their user rights to have their talk page reverted, and therefore they may have been irate enough to leave a 'nasty comment'. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 17:28, 12 May 2009 (UTC) | :Additionally the reverting was probably viewed by the user as vandalism of their talk page, each user's talk page is for communication with others users, the edit history and control over that should rest with the user in question, I can see how the user in question viewed it as a violation of their user rights to have their talk page reverted, and therefore they may have been irate enough to leave a 'nasty comment'. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 17:28, 12 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{Please see|Can we disable visual editor please?}} <br> {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} | {{Please see|Can we disable visual editor please?}} <br> {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}14:24: Thu 22 Dec 2011 </span> | ||
Latest revision as of 16:16, 1 September 2012
User:Bigshowbower's reported issue was with a continued reverting of their talk page by an unregistered user. I reviewed Bigshowbower's talk page and counted 3 reverted edits by User:91.85.169.218, which seemed to be an excessive amounts of reverts, especially given that it was a user's talk page rather than a specific article page. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 14:16, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- As I said I reviewed the edits. I didn't take anyone's word for it. I checked the history of the pages in question and reviewed the content of those pages and the aforementioned edits. We value IP editors as much as signed in editors.
- Could you give me an example of the user in question's 'random reversions'.
- As for the user's 'nasty talk coments', I'm guessing you're referring to the comments left on the IP editor who reverted the user's talk page, three times. I can see the user's point of view and understand their annoyance, reverting the user's page was perhaps not the best way to resolve the situation. The IP editor could have left another message (rather than a revert), left a message with an admin or on the article in question's talk page.
- Additionally the reverting was probably viewed by the user as vandalism of their talk page, each user's talk page is for communication with others users, the edit history and control over that should rest with the user in question, I can see how the user in question viewed it as a violation of their user rights to have their talk page reverted, and therefore they may have been irate enough to leave a 'nasty comment'. --Tangerineduel 17:28, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Your input is needed!
You are invited to join the discussion at Forum:Can we disable visual editor please?.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 14:24: Thu 22 Dec 2011
