User talk:Metardis/Archive 6: Difference between revisions
m (ArchiveTool: Archiving from User_talk:Metardis.) |
m (No, you don't have new messages. Sorry for the false alarm.) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== New editing track == | == New editing track == | ||
Nope. No new editing tracks for at least another three weeks. [[:category:Stubs|Stubs]] would be deeply inappropriate, anyway. I'm not about to put every stub into [[:category:Stubs]], which would be required in order for the editing track to work. That would unravel the very fabric of the stub system. At some point in the future — and there's a reason why editing tracks are released as and when they are — I might consider putting one of the individual stub categories, like [[:category:Astronomical object stubs|Astronomical object stubs]] in an editing track. Don't count on it, though. The point of the [[Game of Rassilon]] is to highlight categories that are not otherwise highlighted. The stub templates themselves are arguably enough of a highlight. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} | Nope. No new editing tracks for at least another three weeks. [[:category:Stubs|Stubs]] would be deeply inappropriate, anyway. I'm not about to put every stub into [[:category:Stubs]], which would be required in order for the editing track to work. That would unravel the very fabric of the stub system. At some point in the future — and there's a reason why editing tracks are released as and when they are — I might consider putting one of the individual stub categories, like [[:category:Astronomical object stubs|Astronomical object stubs]] in an editing track. Don't count on it, though. The point of the [[Game of Rassilon]] is to highlight categories that are not otherwise highlighted. The stub templates themselves are arguably enough of a highlight. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}19:11: Fri 03 Feb 2012 </span> | ||
Revision as of 12:17, 2 September 2012
 |
This page is an archive. Please do not make any edits here. Edit the active conversation only. |
|---|
Images
You recently upload an image for The Man Who Never Was. Unfortunately it violated several images requirements.
1) Firstly, it contained a network logo. This is not allowed and is a reason many images have been deleted. Please make sure all images that are upload contain no network logo (i.e. BBC, CBBC, Ten etc)
2) The image was blurry. All images should be nice and clear. The image would have looked terrible on the page and worse if it had been used as a thumbnail images.
3) The images contained a border. No images should contain a border, however narrow, because it can reduce and make images harder to see when they are on a page.
I would consider looking at Tardis:Image use policy for more details. MM/Want to talk? 19:44, January 31, 2012 (UTC)
New editing track
Nope. No new editing tracks for at least another three weeks. Stubs would be deeply inappropriate, anyway. I'm not about to put every stub into category:Stubs, which would be required in order for the editing track to work. That would unravel the very fabric of the stub system. At some point in the future — and there's a reason why editing tracks are released as and when they are — I might consider putting one of the individual stub categories, like Astronomical object stubs in an editing track. Don't count on it, though. The point of the Game of Rassilon is to highlight categories that are not otherwise highlighted. The stub templates themselves are arguably enough of a highlight.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 19:11: Fri 03 Feb 2012
