Talk:The Two Doctors (TV story): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(removal of information from Myths section) |
m (enforcing Forum:Prefix simplification) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Myths== | ==Myths== | ||
I've removed this information from the Myths section: | I've removed this information from the Myths section: | ||
: It also could be interpreted to imply that the Doctor might have been able to have gotten Jamie's memories restored, and then somehow convinced an older Victoria to start travelling with him again. Decades later, the mini-episode [[ | : It also could be interpreted to imply that the Doctor might have been able to have gotten Jamie's memories restored, and then somehow convinced an older Victoria to start travelling with him again. Decades later, the mini-episode [[TV]]: ''[[Time Crash]]'' provided a rationale for the [[Fifth Doctor]] having aged; the rationale could be extended to suggest why the Second Doctor appears aged here, and therefore imply that this story could have taken place much earlier in his incarnation - e.g., before ''War Games''; however, that would not explain why the Second Doctor was working for the Time Lords.'' However [http://drwhointerviews.wordpress.com/category/robert-holmes/#this] interview with Holmes would. | ||
The statement is far too vague and does not state information, only a source. | The statement is far too vague and does not state information, only a source. | ||
Revision as of 02:02, 19 September 2012
Myths
I've removed this information from the Myths section:
- It also could be interpreted to imply that the Doctor might have been able to have gotten Jamie's memories restored, and then somehow convinced an older Victoria to start travelling with him again. Decades later, the mini-episode TV: Time Crash provided a rationale for the Fifth Doctor having aged; the rationale could be extended to suggest why the Second Doctor appears aged here, and therefore imply that this story could have taken place much earlier in his incarnation - e.g., before War Games; however, that would not explain why the Second Doctor was working for the Time Lords. However [1] interview with Holmes would.
The statement is far too vague and does not state information, only a source.
Additionally the site linked does not provide sources for its information, merely stating in one of the sections for the Robert Holmes article that "This interview is from an old DWM." from which the author of the site has "cut parts out" of. Since we don't know what he's cut out, or from which DWM interview the information is from I don't think it's a valid source.
The information (whatever it is) can be included on the article, but it needs to be cited from its original source, not this second hand chopped up version. --Tangerineduel / talk 14:45, September 16, 2012 (UTC)
