Talk:Dalek weaponry: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(→Pyro-flame: new section) |
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think it would be worth noting that the pyro-flame technology could have been technology harnessed from the victory over the Mechanoids (who were first seen using the technology against the Daleks during their previous encounter episodes ago). Prior to the use of the flamethrowers on Kembel, the Daleks never used the weapons in jungle terrain. --[[User:Radical Edward2|RadicalEdward2]] [[User talk:Radical Edward2|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:07, October 6, 2012 (UTC) | I think it would be worth noting that the pyro-flame technology could have been technology harnessed from the victory over the Mechanoids (who were first seen using the technology against the Daleks during their previous encounter episodes ago). Prior to the use of the flamethrowers on Kembel, the Daleks never used the weapons in jungle terrain. --[[User:Radical Edward2|RadicalEdward2]] [[User talk:Radical Edward2|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:07, October 6, 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Nice idea, but "could have been" is speculation, and we don't do speculation on article pages. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:41, October 6, 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:41, 6 October 2012
Pyro-flame
I think it would be worth noting that the pyro-flame technology could have been technology harnessed from the victory over the Mechanoids (who were first seen using the technology against the Daleks during their previous encounter episodes ago). Prior to the use of the flamethrowers on Kembel, the Daleks never used the weapons in jungle terrain. --RadicalEdward2 ☎ 17:07, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Nice idea, but "could have been" is speculation, and we don't do speculation on article pages. Shambala108 ☎ 17:41, October 6, 2012 (UTC)