Talk:Doctor Who Magazine graphic novels

Article needs splitting, restructuring, better definition.

I'm not sure where to begin on the confused nature of this article. The Panini range is its own deal and must be treated separately. It has a specific purpose, format, and production sensibility. Nowhere on this wiki is there treatment of that range's distinctiveness, and it's primarily because it's lumped into this one page. Secondly there should be discussion on how the term "graphic novel" when applied to Doctor Who does not meet even the normal, broad definition of graphic novel, and is rather a synonym of "trade paperback". Discussion can and will be added to the text to explain the varying usages of "graphic novel" in the British market versus the North American.

A couple of things on the list here are not graphic novels in either sense of the word, while only Age of Chaos comes close to meeting generally-accepted North American sense of the term. Something which is a numbered part of another series (as indicated by the indicia) isn't a graphic novel. On whatever side of the Atlantic you find yourself, the 1985 Summer Special or The Dalek Chronicles aren't graphic novels, they're normal issues of the Doctor Who Magazine Specials. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 23:37, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

The Mark of Mandragora and Abslom Daak - Dalek Killer would also fit the definition of graphic novel.

As for restructuring, the Panini range could be created under Panini Book Graphic Novels (as that's what it's called on the cover, though I'm wondering if it should have 'Doctor Who' in the title somewhere?

Of the Marvel releases they should probably be separated out, the classic comics one belongs with the other classic comics, the same goes for the summer special. I'd argue the Dalek Chronicles magazine is a graphic novel (it's certainly long enough) and does collect ever single story of the original run into one big release. Not sure about the collected comics. So that would leave; Age of Chaos, Voyager, Abslom Daak and The Dalek Chronicles together.

Virgin...well it'd need a page of its own, maybe discussing why it got the rights to release only Mark of Mandragora.--Tangerineduel 05:53, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Well the definitive name of any comic is generally considered to be that which appears on the indicia; i.e., that by which it's copyrighted.

• Age of Chaos definitely deserves its own page, cause the only thing which appears in its indicia is Doctor Who: The Age of Chaos. Contentually, it's the most "novel" DW graphic novel. It's not a trade paperback. It's the only one of these four things — indeed the only DW publication with the term graphic novel on its cover — that actually is a printing of original material (rather than a reprint), and its the only one that tells a single story. Although not bound like a novel, it at least has a definite beginning, middle and end to its story.
• Abslom Daak: Dalek Killer is a slightly controversial inclusion as a graphic novel, but it's clearly no part of any other series. It was a part of the whole attempt to spin him off on his own into the Marvel UK universe, a testing of the waters to see if an Abslom Daak-centered title would work. That effort went nowhere, but this thing remains as a title on its own with no explicit connection to DWMS. It's also a co-production of Marvel UK and another company.
• Voyager is officially Doctor Who Graphic Novel: Voyager, and was co-published by BBC Books. The book acknowledges DWM in its frontispiece, but it's very clearly not a DWMS.
• Dalek Chronicles is, as explained in the talk on its page, explicitly a part of DWMS. It's just a Summer Special. Yes, a rather extraordinary one, but officially that's what it is. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 10:39, 24 July 2008 (UTC)