Forum:Book Plots: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (enforcing Forum:Prefix simplification) |
m (Moving to sentence case on BFBS Series) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:The book plots are something I've considered, but not sure if they're needed. The Publisher's Summary (aka Blurb) does a relatively good job of summarising the story. | :The book plots are something I've considered, but not sure if they're needed. The Publisher's Summary (aka Blurb) does a relatively good job of summarising the story. | ||
:It's just considering that we're currently lacking plots for several TV stories (that is unique plots separate from Wikipedia), and there are a rather large amounts of novels ([[PROSE]], [[PROSE]], [[PROSE]], [[PROSE]], [[PROSE]], [[PROSE]], [[PROSE]], [[PROSE]], [[PROSE]], [[BFBS]] and [[PROSE]]) they're all the main ranges of novels. | :It's just considering that we're currently lacking plots for several TV stories (that is unique plots separate from Wikipedia), and there are a rather large amounts of novels ([[PROSE]], [[PROSE]], [[PROSE]], [[PROSE]], [[PROSE]], [[PROSE]], [[PROSE]], [[PROSE]], [[PROSE]], [[BFBS]] and [[PROSE]]) they're all the main ranges of novels. | ||
:But many of the novel articles still need developing many are lacking detailed references and continuity sections. Many of the [[Short Trips (series)|Short Trips]], [[Virgin Decalogs]] and [[Big Finish Bernice | :But many of the novel articles still need developing many are lacking detailed references and continuity sections. Many of the [[Short Trips (series)|Short Trips]], [[Virgin Decalogs]] and [[Big Finish Bernice Summerfid series]] (short story anthologies) are lacking summaries of their short stories, the setting/year field in a lot of these short stories (within the infobox) is lacking any information. | ||
:Page counts (again within the infobox) is lacking on a lot of pages. (These are just the things I can think of off the top of my head though). --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:04, November 28, 2009 (UTC) | :Page counts (again within the infobox) is lacking on a lot of pages. (These are just the things I can think of off the top of my head though). --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:04, November 28, 2009 (UTC) | ||
Yeah...good point-[[User:Excalibur-117|Excalibur-117]] 14:09, November 28, 2009 (UTC) | Yeah...good point-[[User:Excalibur-117|Excalibur-117]] 14:09, November 28, 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:52, 6 June 2013
Forums → Archive index → Reference desk archives → Book Plots
Right, I know I'm probally nitpicking, but seeing as we have little in the way to do except Dreamland and mantenice, couldn't we try to develope the pages about novels? Just a thought - Excalibur-117 18:49, November 27, 2009 (UTC)
- Well, little in the way to do is somewhat of an understatement, check out Tardis:To Do List if you want to see the long list of things that need doing, then of course there's the Wantedpages.
- The book plots are something I've considered, but not sure if they're needed. The Publisher's Summary (aka Blurb) does a relatively good job of summarising the story.
- It's just considering that we're currently lacking plots for several TV stories (that is unique plots separate from Wikipedia), and there are a rather large amounts of novels (PROSE, PROSE, PROSE, PROSE, PROSE, PROSE, PROSE, PROSE, PROSE, BFBS and PROSE) they're all the main ranges of novels.
- But many of the novel articles still need developing many are lacking detailed references and continuity sections. Many of the Short Trips, Virgin Decalogs and Big Finish Bernice Summerfid series (short story anthologies) are lacking summaries of their short stories, the setting/year field in a lot of these short stories (within the infobox) is lacking any information.
- Page counts (again within the infobox) is lacking on a lot of pages. (These are just the things I can think of off the top of my head though). --Tangerineduel 14:04, November 28, 2009 (UTC)
Yeah...good point-Excalibur-117 14:09, November 28, 2009 (UTC)
