Talk:The Doctor's first TARDIS: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


:Based on your info JagoAndLitefoot, should the page not be named Chronoscope? As that would be the most unique name for the page? --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 15:56, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
:Based on your info JagoAndLitefoot, should the page not be named Chronoscope? As that would be the most unique name for the page? --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 15:56, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
::Not really, as it was the name that Sibor used for it, when she believed it to be a machine for predicting the future. After it's revealed to be the Doctor's first TARDIS, it's no longer referred to as "Chronoscope" by anyone, except maybe Sibor once or twice. So "Chronoscope" is what it was referred to because it was initially believed to be a machine for making prediction about the future, but it turns out not to be the case. So I think that "The Doctor's first TARDIS" is the best name for the article.  [[User:JagoAndLitefoot|JagoAndLitefoot]] [[User talk:JagoAndLitefoot|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:58, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
::Not really, as it was the name that Sibor used for it, when she believed it to be a machine for predicting the future. After it's revealed to be the Doctor's first TARDIS, it's no longer referred to as "Chronoscope" by anyone, except maybe Sibor once or twice. So "Chronoscope" is what it was referred to because it was initially believed to be a machine for making prediction about the future, but it turns out not to be the case. So I think that "The Doctor's first TARDIS" is the best name for the article - it's still a unique name, as it's the only "first TARDIS" of his.  [[User:JagoAndLitefoot|JagoAndLitefoot]] [[User talk:JagoAndLitefoot|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:58, June 12, 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:02, 12 June 2013

Name

Why the move? It was never actually called just "The Doctor's TARDIS" in "Prisoners of Fate". It was either referred to as his "first TARDIS", "Type 50" or "Chronoscope" (by Sibor). JagoAndLitefoot 15:25, June 12, 2013 (UTC)

Based on your info JagoAndLitefoot, should the page not be named Chronoscope? As that would be the most unique name for the page? --Tangerineduel / talk 15:56, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
Not really, as it was the name that Sibor used for it, when she believed it to be a machine for predicting the future. After it's revealed to be the Doctor's first TARDIS, it's no longer referred to as "Chronoscope" by anyone, except maybe Sibor once or twice. So "Chronoscope" is what it was referred to because it was initially believed to be a machine for making prediction about the future, but it turns out not to be the case. So I think that "The Doctor's first TARDIS" is the best name for the article - it's still a unique name, as it's the only "first TARDIS" of his. JagoAndLitefoot 15:58, June 12, 2013 (UTC)