Talk:End of Days (TV story): Difference between revisions
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The only similarity I see is between Bilis' clock store and Edward Waterfield's antique shop. | The only similarity I see is between Bilis' clock store and Edward Waterfield's antique shop. | ||
[[User:Americanwhofan|Americanwhofan]] 21:56, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | [[User:Americanwhofan|Americanwhofan]] 21:56, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
* And both stores contained items that were out of place for the current time period. [[User:Craigysa|Craigysa]] [[User talk:Craigysa|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:32, December 6, 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Oops == | == Oops == | ||
Revision as of 13:32, 6 December 2013
The Evil of the Daleks
The article says "The concept of scavanging antiques from the past was first used in DW: The Evil of the Daleks" Who in this story is doing this? The only similarity I see is between Bilis' clock store and Edward Waterfield's antique shop. Americanwhofan 21:56, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- And both stores contained items that were out of place for the current time period. Craigysa ☎ 13:32, December 6, 2013 (UTC)
Oops
I accidentally removed RTD from the credits. Sorry about that. And thanks to User:Doug86 for noticing/fixing :)
--Llauren 10:08, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Plot Ending
I have changed the ending sentence in Plot from "The team stand sadly, beliving that Jack has finally died" to "The team stand in the Hub, wondering what has taken Jack". The reason for this is there is nothing to indicate they believe Jack has died and the dialogue from the opening of Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang suggests that the team believe Jack is just missing not dead. To have a statement saying they believe he has died just doesn't fit in, I would suggest leaving my change or removing both statements entirely. Allons-Y! 21:38, February 10, 2013 (UTC)
