Category talk:Near-human species: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
How close does "physically identical" have to be? Does it have to be "indistinguable from" Humans (in which case the orange-skinned [[Lurman]]s shouldn't be classed as a Near-Humans), or should it mean close to Humans - humanoid, with the main features (hair, nose, eyes) almost identical to Humans (in which the [[Lurman]]s could stay in, and the silver-skinned [[Diplosian]]s could go in the categor)? {{:User:Ghelæ/sig}} 16:42, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
How close does "physically identical" have to be? Does it have to be "indistinguable from" Humans (in which case the orange-skinned [[Lurman]]s shouldn't be classed as a Near-Humans), or should it mean close to Humans - humanoid, with the main features (hair, nose, eyes) almost identical to Humans (in which the [[Lurman]]s could stay in, and the silver-skinned [[Diplosian]]s could go in the categor)? {{:User:Ghelæ/sig}} 16:42, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
:I meant that they could pass as [[Human]]s without close scrutiny . I've seen Humans with a more extreme skin-tone then the [[Lurman]]s, though I've never seen one with silver skin. [[User:Azes13|Azes13]] 22:23, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:23, 18 November 2006

How close does "physically identical" have to be? Does it have to be "indistinguable from" Humans (in which case the orange-skinned Lurmans shouldn't be classed as a Near-Humans), or should it mean close to Humans - humanoid, with the main features (hair, nose, eyes) almost identical to Humans (in which the Lurmans could stay in, and the silver-skinned Diplosians could go in the categor)? ~ Ghelæ -talk-contribs 16:42, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

I meant that they could pass as Humans without close scrutiny . I've seen Humans with a more extreme skin-tone then the Lurmans, though I've never seen one with silver skin. Azes13 22:23, 18 November 2006 (UTC)