Talk:Tasha Lem: Difference between revisions
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) (Undo revision 1638343 by Xt0rt3r (talk) it is a violation of Tardis:Vandalism policy to remove posts from a talk page, even if they're your own) |
MystExplorer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:It looks like she is an unknown incarnation of River Song - Lem is Mel backwards, and Tasha is short for Natasha, which translates into "Born on Christmas". Moffat wouldn't miss this opportunity. [[User:Nitrobg|Nitrobg]] [[User talk:Nitrobg|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 12:05, December 28, 2013 (UTC) | :It looks like she is an unknown incarnation of River Song - Lem is Mel backwards, and Tasha is short for Natasha, which translates into "Born on Christmas". Moffat wouldn't miss this opportunity. [[User:Nitrobg|Nitrobg]] [[User talk:Nitrobg|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 12:05, December 28, 2013 (UTC) | ||
::For now at least, this is just speculation, and as such belongs only on [[Howling:The Howling]]. Thanks. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:46, December 28, 2013 (UTC) | ::For now at least, this is just speculation, and as such belongs only on [[Howling:The Howling]]. Thanks. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:46, December 28, 2013 (UTC) | ||
I know there's been some speculation that Tasha was originally meant to be River. If there's any truth to that, it may have only been very early on. Maybe at the story outline stage. Because a close examination of the episode reveals that River couldn't possibly have filled Tasha's role. It wouldn't make sense for River to be head of the Papal Mainframe, much less for her to be Dalek-ized. I also can't see her threatening to destroy an entire planet (especially one with a human colony on it). So apart from a few lines of dialogue and a somewhat flirty relationship with the Doctor, the two characters don't really have much in common. [[User:Slughorn42|Slughorn42]] [[User talk:Slughorn42|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:45, December 30, 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:45, 30 December 2013
Theory she mentions dying to the Daleks multiple times, has an ambiguously sexual relationship with the Doctor and can pilot the Tardis
Is it possible this is actually River Song?– The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.253.76.102 (talk).
- No. Evan Norton ☎ 07:24, December 27, 2013 (UTC)
- that's just silly. of course not. Allisonbn ☎ 02:29, December 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Allisonbn please read Tardis:No personal attacks. There is no need to insult an editor or his idea. Shambala108 ☎ 02:48, December 28, 2013 (UTC)
- that's just silly. of course not. Allisonbn ☎ 02:29, December 28, 2013 (UTC)
- It looks like she is an unknown incarnation of River Song - Lem is Mel backwards, and Tasha is short for Natasha, which translates into "Born on Christmas". Moffat wouldn't miss this opportunity. Nitrobg ☎ 12:05, December 28, 2013 (UTC)
- For now at least, this is just speculation, and as such belongs only on Howling:The Howling. Thanks. Shambala108 ☎ 15:46, December 28, 2013 (UTC)
I know there's been some speculation that Tasha was originally meant to be River. If there's any truth to that, it may have only been very early on. Maybe at the story outline stage. Because a close examination of the episode reveals that River couldn't possibly have filled Tasha's role. It wouldn't make sense for River to be head of the Papal Mainframe, much less for her to be Dalek-ized. I also can't see her threatening to destroy an entire planet (especially one with a human colony on it). So apart from a few lines of dialogue and a somewhat flirty relationship with the Doctor, the two characters don't really have much in common. Slughorn42 ☎ 02:45, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
