Talk:The Five Doctors (TV story): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(New page: Is the current format of the plotholes/errors section of this article seriously within guidelines? It seems very un-wiki to me to have two people arguing over events/opinions within the a...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is the current format of the plotholes/errors section of this article seriously within guidelines? It seems very un-wiki to me to have two people arguing over events/opinions within the article itself, with very obviously two voices present in the narration. [[Special:Contributions/203.33.165.216|203.33.165.216]] 08:23, 11 March 2009 (UTC) | Is the current format of the plotholes/errors section of this article seriously within guidelines? It seems very un-wiki to me to have two people arguing over events/opinions within the article itself, with very obviously two voices present in the narration. [[Special:Contributions/203.33.165.216|203.33.165.216]] 08:23, 11 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:It occasionally needs a clean up. The comments in italics should come from canon and shouldn't contain speculative phrases. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:36, 11 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:36, 11 March 2009
Is the current format of the plotholes/errors section of this article seriously within guidelines? It seems very un-wiki to me to have two people arguing over events/opinions within the article itself, with very obviously two voices present in the narration. 203.33.165.216 08:23, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- It occasionally needs a clean up. The comments in italics should come from canon and shouldn't contain speculative phrases. --Tangerineduel 13:36, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
