Forum:Consistency in magazine issue pages: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with '{{Forumheader|Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> ==The problem== So. When you want to access a page...') |
Stardizzy2 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I don't think you'd have to go back and manually change existing links (though how many are there, really?) But I think for consistency, it needs to work like the rest of the magazines. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 17:52, 15 May 2009 (UTC) | I don't think you'd have to go back and manually change existing links (though how many are there, really?) But I think for consistency, it needs to work like the rest of the magazines. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 17:52, 15 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I would rather the magazines have the issue names spelled out in full, but I agree. just for consistency. --[[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 17:58, 15 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:58, 15 May 2009
Index → Panopticon → Consistency in magazine issue pages
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
The problem
So. When you want to access a page for an issue of a magazine, there's generally a simple formula: Prefix + Issue + XXX. For instance DWM Issue 100, DWA Issue 3, DWMS Summer 1993. Why, then, when you want to access an issue of Battles in Time is it Doctor Who: Battles in Time Issue 61? Shouldn't all these pages be moved to BIT Issue XXX?
I don't think you'd have to go back and manually change existing links (though how many are there, really?) But I think for consistency, it needs to work like the rest of the magazines. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 17:52, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
- I would rather the magazines have the issue names spelled out in full, but I agree. just for consistency. --Stardizzy2 17:58, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
