Template:Oou: Difference between revisions
m (Changed protection level for "Template:Oou": Robot: Protecting all pages from category templates ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))) |
No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<includeonly><div id="article-type" class="type-oou"> | <includeonly><div id="article-type" class="type-oou"> | ||
<div id="type-title">This article needs an [[TARDIS:Point of view|in-universe perspective]].</div> | <div id="type-title">This article needs an [[TARDIS:Point of view|in-universe perspective]].</div> | ||
<p style="font-size:90%;line-height:100%;"> It currently has too much of a [[Tardis:Manual of Style#Out-of-universe|real-world perspective]]. It may also be written primarily in the '''present''' tense. Please check the overall content against our [[Tardis: Manual of Style|Manual of Style]], consult the [[Talk:{{PAGENAME}}|talk page]] and [{{Fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|action=history}} revision history] for any relevant notes, employ the '''past''' tense, and then remove this message.</p></div></includeonly><includeonly> | <p style="font-size:90%;line-height:100%;"> It currently has too much of a [[Tardis:Manual of Style#Out-of-universe|real-world perspective]]. It may also be written primarily in the '''present''' tense. Please check the overall content against our [[Tardis: Manual of Style|Manual of Style]], consult the [[Talk:{{PAGENAME}}|talk page]] and [{{Fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|action=history}} revision history] for any relevant notes, employ the '''past''' tense, and then remove this message.</p></div></includeonly><includeonly>{{cat|Out of universe cleanup}}</includeonly><noinclude> | ||
'''{{PAGENAME}}''' is for use on [[Doctor Who universe|''Doctor Who'' universe]] articles that have fallen foul of [[Tardis:Point of view]] and/or [[Tardis:Resources]]. Usually such a condition is easily diagnosed. If a DWU article is mainly written in the present tense, it's a candidate for this template. Or, if it uses sources [[Tardis:Valid sources|we do not consider valid]], this template could also be employed. Generally, editors should try to fix these errors on their own, but sometimes there just isn't time. Using this template at least alerts others to the problem. | '''{{PAGENAME}}''' is for use on [[Doctor Who universe|''Doctor Who'' universe]] articles that have fallen foul of [[Tardis:Point of view]] and/or [[Tardis:Resources]]. Usually such a condition is easily diagnosed. If a DWU article is mainly written in the present tense, it's a candidate for this template. Or, if it uses sources [[Tardis:Valid sources|we do not consider valid]], this template could also be employed. Generally, editors should try to fix these errors on their own, but sometimes there just isn't time. Using this template at least alerts others to the problem. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{{Oou}} | {{Oou}} | ||
== Categorization == | == Categorization == | ||
Articles tagged with this template are sent automatically to [[:Category:Out of | Articles tagged with this template are sent automatically to [[:Category:Out of universe cleanup]]. | ||
[[Category:Maintenance templates|{{PAGENAME}}]]</noinclude> | [[Category:Maintenance templates|{{PAGENAME}}]]</noinclude> | ||
Revision as of 23:58, 29 August 2016
Oou is for use on Doctor Who universe articles that have fallen foul of Tardis:Point of view and/or Tardis:Resources. Usually such a condition is easily diagnosed. If a DWU article is mainly written in the present tense, it's a candidate for this template. Or, if it uses sources we do not consider valid, this template could also be employed. Generally, editors should try to fix these errors on their own, but sometimes there just isn't time. Using this template at least alerts others to the problem.
Note that if the article is merely missing information, Template:Update is perhaps more appropriate. If it needs extensive copy-editing or substantial speculation removal, Template:Cleanup is the one to go for.
Usage
Type
{{oou}}
at the top of the article requiring attention.
It currently has too much of a real-world perspective. It may also be written primarily in the present tense. Please check the overall content against our Manual of Style, consult the talk page and revision history for any relevant notes, employ the past tense, and then remove this message.
Categorization
Articles tagged with this template are sent automatically to Category:Out of universe cleanup.
