Talk:Killer petal: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
Tag: sourceedit
No edit summary
Tag: sourceedit
Line 7: Line 7:
An awfully large number? They are all across London and comments were made saying that soon there'd be so many that people would start to be suffocated by them. I think "thousands" is actually a tiny amount compared to what we're being told, I'd think more along the line of millions of petals. --[[User:Xx-connor-xX|Xx-connor-xX]] [[User talk:Xx-connor-xX|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:52, November 5, 2016 (UTC)
An awfully large number? They are all across London and comments were made saying that soon there'd be so many that people would start to be suffocated by them. I think "thousands" is actually a tiny amount compared to what we're being told, I'd think more along the line of millions of petals. --[[User:Xx-connor-xX|Xx-connor-xX]] [[User talk:Xx-connor-xX|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:52, November 5, 2016 (UTC)
:If a petal doubles 1000 times, the number gets so big, it has to use different notations. They definitely didn't double thousand times --[[User:Глючарина|Glucharina]] [[User talk:Глючарина|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:55, November 5, 2016 (UTC)
:If a petal doubles 1000 times, the number gets so big, it has to use different notations. They definitely didn't double thousand times --[[User:Глючарина|Glucharina]] [[User talk:Глючарина|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:55, November 5, 2016 (UTC)
::Each petal is doubling, not just one. We've only seen a tiny part of London and already the streets are covered with them. --[[User:Xx-connor-xX|Xx-connor-xX]] [[User talk:Xx-connor-xX|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:57, November 5, 2016 (UTC)


==What was the basis of the rename?==
==What was the basis of the rename?==
I originally titled this article as "Killer petals" but it has since been renamed as "Killer petal". I don't understand this change as the name would suggest that the article is talking about one single petal rather than the large quantity that we've seen. --[[User:Xx-connor-xX|Xx-connor-xX]] [[User talk:Xx-connor-xX|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:52, November 5, 2016 (UTC)
I originally titled this article as "Killer petals" but it has since been renamed as "Killer petal". I don't understand this change as the name would suggest that the article is talking about one single petal rather than the large quantity that we've seen. --[[User:Xx-connor-xX|Xx-connor-xX]] [[User talk:Xx-connor-xX|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:52, November 5, 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:57, 5 November 2016

Fairy petals

Is it possible that these "killer petals" would be the same, or connected to, the petals that the fairies stuffed in their victims' mouths/lungs in the Torchwood episode Small Worlds? --DCLM 12:53, November 5, 2016 (UTC)

Thousands time in a day

I don't believe this number was ever given in the episode and two in power of thousand is an awfully large number. Unless someone remember this exact line, maybe it should be rewritten? --Glucharina 19:16, November 5, 2016 (UTC)

An awfully large number? They are all across London and comments were made saying that soon there'd be so many that people would start to be suffocated by them. I think "thousands" is actually a tiny amount compared to what we're being told, I'd think more along the line of millions of petals. --Xx-connor-xX 19:52, November 5, 2016 (UTC)

If a petal doubles 1000 times, the number gets so big, it has to use different notations. They definitely didn't double thousand times --Glucharina 19:55, November 5, 2016 (UTC)
Each petal is doubling, not just one. We've only seen a tiny part of London and already the streets are covered with them. --Xx-connor-xX 19:57, November 5, 2016 (UTC)

What was the basis of the rename?

I originally titled this article as "Killer petals" but it has since been renamed as "Killer petal". I don't understand this change as the name would suggest that the article is talking about one single petal rather than the large quantity that we've seen. --Xx-connor-xX 19:52, November 5, 2016 (UTC)