Talk:The Master's TARDIS: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
Stardizzy2 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: I would be delighted if someone could point out to me where it is indicated in this story that the Master's TARDIS is a Type 40. To my recollection, the Doctor tells Jo that the Master's dematerialisation circuit is a Type II (unlike his own Type I), but never says "Type 40" nor does he say that it is the same model/Type as his own TARDIS. If my recollection is wrong, I'd be happy to see the specific quote/reference. If my recollection is correct however, we should of course remove the erroneous statement that is still on this page. Thanks :) [[User:Spreee|Spreee]] 16:10, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Spreee | : I would be delighted if someone could point out to me where it is indicated in this story that the Master's TARDIS is a Type 40. To my recollection, the Doctor tells Jo that the Master's dematerialisation circuit is a Type II (unlike his own Type I), but never says "Type 40" nor does he say that it is the same model/Type as his own TARDIS. If my recollection is wrong, I'd be happy to see the specific quote/reference. If my recollection is correct however, we should of course remove the erroneous statement that is still on this page. Thanks :) [[User:Spreee|Spreee]] 16:10, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Spreee | ||
::well, if you find the article inaccurate, please go on and change it. --[[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 17:58, 22 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:58, 22 June 2009
The Master's TARDIS was NOT identified as a Type 40 in Terror of the Autons. The Doctor simply indicates that the Master's TARDIS uses a Type II dematerialisation circuit, while his own uses a Type I.
- I would be delighted if someone could point out to me where it is indicated in this story that the Master's TARDIS is a Type 40. To my recollection, the Doctor tells Jo that the Master's dematerialisation circuit is a Type II (unlike his own Type I), but never says "Type 40" nor does he say that it is the same model/Type as his own TARDIS. If my recollection is wrong, I'd be happy to see the specific quote/reference. If my recollection is correct however, we should of course remove the erroneous statement that is still on this page. Thanks :) Spreee 16:10, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Spreee
- well, if you find the article inaccurate, please go on and change it. --Stardizzy2 17:58, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
