Talk:Series 10 (Doctor Who 2005): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Tag: sourceedit |
No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::::: He's a director, it says h's the director and he's not the writer... conclusive. [[Special:Contributions/82.3.146.201|82.3.146.201]]<sup>[[User talk:82.3.146.201#top|talk to me]]</sup> 18:24, February 6, 2017 (UTC) | ::::: He's a director, it says h's the director and he's not the writer... conclusive. [[Special:Contributions/82.3.146.201|82.3.146.201]]<sup>[[User talk:82.3.146.201#top|talk to me]]</sup> 18:24, February 6, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::::: It does not say so. --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:46, February 6, 2017 (UTC) | :::::: It does not say so. --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:46, February 6, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::::: Radio Times says so, I'd rather go with RT saying a director with directorial experiences is directing it rather than a quite self-run site saying that a director is writing it. [[Special:Contributions/82.3.146.201|82.3.146.201]]<sup>[[User talk:82.3.146.201#top|talk to me]]</sup> 19:58, February 6, 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:58, 6 February 2017
Source contradictions
A problem has occurred on who has written the sixth episode of the Series. French CV on Laurent Maurel says that said episode was written by Daniel Nettheim. A different source, namely Radio Times, had labelled Steven Moffat and Peter Harness as co-writers of said episode. What do we do in such case? --DCLM ☎ 20:30, February 1, 2017 (UTC)
- Can someone help explain this? --DCLM ☎ 14:03, February 5, 2017 (UTC)
- Daniel Nettheim is the director. 82.3.146.201talk to me 18:02, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
- You can't just conclude it like that. Radio Times says differently. --DCLM ☎ 18:15, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
- And why would the CV list the director over the writer? --DCLM ☎ 18:17, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
- He's a director, it says h's the director and he's not the writer... conclusive. 82.3.146.201talk to me 18:24, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
- It does not say so. --DCLM ☎ 19:46, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
- Radio Times says so, I'd rather go with RT saying a director with directorial experiences is directing it rather than a quite self-run site saying that a director is writing it. 82.3.146.201talk to me 19:58, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
- He's a director, it says h's the director and he's not the writer... conclusive. 82.3.146.201talk to me 18:24, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
- And why would the CV list the director over the writer? --DCLM ☎ 18:17, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
- You can't just conclude it like that. Radio Times says differently. --DCLM ☎ 18:15, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
- Daniel Nettheim is the director. 82.3.146.201talk to me 18:02, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
