Steven Carter: Difference between revisions
Bigshowbower (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Whoniverse93 (talk | contribs) (It's new series) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Steven Carter''' was the son of | '''Steven Carter''' was the son of Joe and [[Alice Carter]] and the grandson of [[Jack Harkness]] and [[Lucia Moretti]]. Being a young boy of school age, he was affected by[[the 456| the 456]]'s invasion. He believed Jack to be his uncle, and was as yet unaware of Jack's immortality and agelessness. The two appeared close, although their contact was infrequent. When Jack needed a child to defeat the 456, Steven was used as the child to reverse the signal. The noise of the children's scream killed him but destroyed the 456, which saved the Earth's children. His mother cradled his dead body as Jack watched. | ||
==Behind the Scenes== | ==Behind the Scenes== | ||
This was the first time, including the new | This was the first time, including the new series of Doctor Who, that a child has been killed on-screen. | ||
{{Template:Cleanup}} | {{Template:Cleanup}} | ||
[[Category:Individuals]] | [[Category:Individuals]] | ||
Revision as of 10:07, 14 July 2009
Steven Carter was the son of Joe and Alice Carter and the grandson of Jack Harkness and Lucia Moretti. Being a young boy of school age, he was affected by the 456's invasion. He believed Jack to be his uncle, and was as yet unaware of Jack's immortality and agelessness. The two appeared close, although their contact was infrequent. When Jack needed a child to defeat the 456, Steven was used as the child to reverse the signal. The noise of the children's scream killed him but destroyed the 456, which saved the Earth's children. His mother cradled his dead body as Jack watched.
Behind the Scenes
This was the first time, including the new series of Doctor Who, that a child has been killed on-screen.
It's unclear what's wrong with the article, because the editor who placed this tag here didn't enumerate the page's problems.
These problems might be so great that the article's factual accuracy has been compromised. Talk about it here or check the revision history or Manual of Style for more information.
