Forum:Character Profiles on K9 DVDs: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (Periodic archive on the eve of series 7)
No edit summary
Tag: sourceedit
Line 1: Line 1:
{{archive|Panopticon archives}}
{{archive|Panopticon archives}}
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
The ''K9'' Series 1 DVDs (both Vol. 1 and Vol. 2) have "Character Profiles" as extras. (They're just about the only extras on the discs, in fact.) Are these profiles a valid source for article information? Our usual rule here has been that we include only ''narrative''-based information (though I'm not sure what the original rationale behind that was), but some of the articles on the ''K9'' characters have information from these "Character Profiles". For example, [[Drake#Early life]] is drawn completely from the "Character Profile" on Vol. 2 Disc 2.
The ''K9'' Series 1 DVDs (both Vol. 1 and Vol. 2) have "Character Profiles" as extras. (They're just about the only extras on the discs, in fact.) Are these profiles a valid source for article information? Our usual rule here has been that we include only ''narrative''-based information (though I'm not sure what the original rationale behind that was), but some of the articles on the ''K9'' characters have information from these "Character Profiles". For example, [[Drake (Liberation)#Early life]] is drawn completely from the "Character Profile" on Vol. 2 Disc 2.


Should this material be removed, or retained with a citation to the Character Profile? If it's to be kept, do we need a new prefix for it, or some other way to refer to it? —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <sup>[[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk to me]]</sup> 04:51, June 7, 2012 (UTC)
Should this material be removed, or retained with a citation to the Character Profile? If it's to be kept, do we need a new prefix for it, or some other way to refer to it? —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <sup>[[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk to me]]</sup> 04:51, June 7, 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:24, 9 March 2017

ForumsArchive indexPanopticon archives → Character Profiles on K9 DVDs
This thread has been archived.
Please create a new thread on the new forums if you want to talk about this topic some more.
Please DO NOT add to this discussion.


The K9 Series 1 DVDs (both Vol. 1 and Vol. 2) have "Character Profiles" as extras. (They're just about the only extras on the discs, in fact.) Are these profiles a valid source for article information? Our usual rule here has been that we include only narrative-based information (though I'm not sure what the original rationale behind that was), but some of the articles on the K9 characters have information from these "Character Profiles". For example, Drake (Liberation)#Early life is drawn completely from the "Character Profile" on Vol. 2 Disc 2.

Should this material be removed, or retained with a citation to the Character Profile? If it's to be kept, do we need a new prefix for it, or some other way to refer to it? —Josiah Rowe talk to me 04:51, June 7, 2012 (UTC)

Nope, they're disallowed in the in-universe portion of articles. See Rule 1 at Tardis:Valid sources#Four little rules. They can certainly be in the behind-the-scenes section though. The closest applicable prefix is DOC, though if you wanted to create a more specific one, like K9CP, that'd be fine, too.
czechout<staff />   16:21: Fri 08 Jun 2012 
K9CP it is. I'll try to clean up those K9 character pages soon. —Josiah Rowe talk to me 20:29, June 9, 2012 (UTC)