Talk:Series 10 (Doctor Who 2005): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) Tag: sourceedit |
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div id=box> | |||
Please note that, per [[Tardis:Spoiler policy]], spoilers may not be posted on this talk page. Spoilers are only allowed on the Series 10 page itself. | |||
</div> | |||
==Source contradictions== | ==Source contradictions== | ||
A problem has occurred on who has written the sixth episode of the Series. French CV on Laurent Maurel says that said episode was written by | A problem has occurred on who has written the sixth episode of the Series. French CV on Laurent Maurel says that said episode was written by <removed per [[Tardis:Spoiler policy]]>. A different source, namely Radio Times, had labelled <removed per [[Tardis:Spoiler policy]]> as co-writers of said episode. What do we do in such case? --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:30, February 1, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:Can someone help explain this? --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:03, February 5, 2017 (UTC) | :Can someone help explain this? --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:03, February 5, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:: | :: <removed per [[Tardis:Spoiler policy]]> is the director. [[Special:Contributions/82.3.146.201|82.3.146.201]]<sup>[[User talk:82.3.146.201#top|talk to me]]</sup> 18:02, February 6, 2017 (UTC) | ||
::: You can't just conclude it like that. Radio Times says differently. --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:15, February 6, 2017 (UTC) | ::: You can't just conclude it like that. Radio Times says differently. --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:15, February 6, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::: And why would the CV list the director over the writer? --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:17, February 6, 2017 (UTC) | :::: And why would the CV list the director over the writer? --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:17, February 6, 2017 (UTC) | ||
| Line 8: | Line 12: | ||
:::::: It does not say so. --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:46, February 6, 2017 (UTC) | :::::: It does not say so. --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:46, February 6, 2017 (UTC) | ||
::::::: Radio Times says so, I'd rather go with RT saying a director with directorial experiences is directing it rather than a quite self-run site saying that a director is writing it. [[Special:Contributions/82.3.146.201|82.3.146.201]]<sup>[[User talk:82.3.146.201#top|talk to me]]</sup> 19:58, February 6, 2017 (UTC) | ::::::: Radio Times says so, I'd rather go with RT saying a director with directorial experiences is directing it rather than a quite self-run site saying that a director is writing it. [[Special:Contributions/82.3.146.201|82.3.146.201]]<sup>[[User talk:82.3.146.201#top|talk to me]]</sup> 19:58, February 6, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::::::: I can't see that. I've read it up and down. Can't see it. And in any case, why didn't you add | :::::::: I can't see that. I've read it up and down. Can't see it. And in any case, why didn't you add <removed per [[Tardis:Spoiler policy]]> as the director? --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 11:35, February 7, 2017 (UTC) | ||
== The Sun == | == The Sun == | ||
Going to put this here so there's a record: ''The Sun'' is not a valid source for real world articles. Any post on this page that uses ''The Sun'' as its source will be removed. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:24, April 6, 2017 (UTC) | Going to put this here so there's a record: ''The Sun'' is not a valid source for real world articles. Any post on this page that uses ''The Sun'' as its source will be removed. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:24, April 6, 2017 (UTC) | ||
== Series 10 page == | |||
There is a need to clear up a couple of things regarding this page and [[Tardis:Spoiler policy]]. | |||
* '''Everything''' posted to the series 10 page '''must have a source'''. Anything that doesn't have a '''valid''' source will be removed. Repeated adding of unsourced material even after it has been removed is a violation of [[Tardis:Editing policy]] and could lead to a block. | |||
* Do '''not''', I repeat, do '''not''' post spoiler information in edit summaries. Edit summaries are visible to everyone; posting spoilers in the edit summary violates [[Tardis:Spoiler policy]]. Repeated violations of this nature could lead to a block. | |||
Thanks for your attention. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:11, April 11, 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:11, 11 April 2017
Please note that, per Tardis:Spoiler policy, spoilers may not be posted on this talk page. Spoilers are only allowed on the Series 10 page itself.
Source contradictions
A problem has occurred on who has written the sixth episode of the Series. French CV on Laurent Maurel says that said episode was written by <removed per Tardis:Spoiler policy>. A different source, namely Radio Times, had labelled <removed per Tardis:Spoiler policy> as co-writers of said episode. What do we do in such case? --DCLM ☎ 20:30, February 1, 2017 (UTC)
- Can someone help explain this? --DCLM ☎ 14:03, February 5, 2017 (UTC)
- <removed per Tardis:Spoiler policy> is the director. 82.3.146.201talk to me 18:02, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
- You can't just conclude it like that. Radio Times says differently. --DCLM ☎ 18:15, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
- And why would the CV list the director over the writer? --DCLM ☎ 18:17, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
- He's a director, it says h's the director and he's not the writer... conclusive. 82.3.146.201talk to me 18:24, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
- It does not say so. --DCLM ☎ 19:46, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
- Radio Times says so, I'd rather go with RT saying a director with directorial experiences is directing it rather than a quite self-run site saying that a director is writing it. 82.3.146.201talk to me 19:58, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
- I can't see that. I've read it up and down. Can't see it. And in any case, why didn't you add <removed per Tardis:Spoiler policy> as the director? --DCLM ☎ 11:35, February 7, 2017 (UTC)
- Radio Times says so, I'd rather go with RT saying a director with directorial experiences is directing it rather than a quite self-run site saying that a director is writing it. 82.3.146.201talk to me 19:58, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
- It does not say so. --DCLM ☎ 19:46, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
- He's a director, it says h's the director and he's not the writer... conclusive. 82.3.146.201talk to me 18:24, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
- And why would the CV list the director over the writer? --DCLM ☎ 18:17, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
- You can't just conclude it like that. Radio Times says differently. --DCLM ☎ 18:15, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
- <removed per Tardis:Spoiler policy> is the director. 82.3.146.201talk to me 18:02, February 6, 2017 (UTC)
The Sun
Going to put this here so there's a record: The Sun is not a valid source for real world articles. Any post on this page that uses The Sun as its source will be removed. Shambala108 ☎ 03:24, April 6, 2017 (UTC)
Series 10 page
There is a need to clear up a couple of things regarding this page and Tardis:Spoiler policy.
- Everything posted to the series 10 page must have a source. Anything that doesn't have a valid source will be removed. Repeated adding of unsourced material even after it has been removed is a violation of Tardis:Editing policy and could lead to a block.
- Do not, I repeat, do not post spoiler information in edit summaries. Edit summaries are visible to everyone; posting spoilers in the edit summary violates Tardis:Spoiler policy. Repeated violations of this nature could lead to a block.
Thanks for your attention. Shambala108 ☎ 00:11, April 11, 2017 (UTC)
