Talk:Series 10 (Doctor Who 2005)

Please note that, per Tardis:Spoiler policy, spoilers may not be posted on this talk page. Spoilers are only allowed on the Series 10 page itself.

Source contradictions

A problem has occurred on who has written the sixth episode of the Series. French CV on Laurent Maurel says that said episode was written by <removed per Tardis:Spoiler policy>. A different source, namely Radio Times, had labelled <removed per Tardis:Spoiler policy> as co-writers of said episode. What do we do in such case? --DCLM ☎ 20:30, February 1, 2017 (UTC)

Can someone help explain this? --DCLM ☎ 14:03, February 5, 2017 (UTC)

<removed per Tardis:Spoiler policy> is the director. 82.3.146.201^{talk to me} 18:02, February 6, 2017 (UTC)

You can't just conclude it like that. Radio Times says differently. --DCLM ☎ 18:15, February 6, 2017 (UTC)

And why would the CV list the director over the writer? --DCLM ☎ 18:17, February 6, 2017 (UTC)

He's a director, it says h's the director and he's not the writer... conclusive. 82.3.146.201^{talk to me} 18:24, February 6, 2017 (UTC)

It does not say so. --DCLM ☎ 19:46, February 6, 2017 (UTC)

Radio Times says so, I'd rather go with RT saying a director with directorial experiences is directing it rather than a quite self-run site saying that a director is writing it. 82.3.146.201^{talk to me} 19:58, February 6, 2017 (UTC)

I can't see that. I've read it up and down. Can't see it. And in any case, why didn't you add <removed per Tardis:Spoiler policy> as the director? --DCLM ☎ 11:35, February 7, 2017 (UTC)

The Sun

Going to put this here so there's a record: The Sun is not a valid source for real world articles. Any post on this page that uses The Sun as its source will be removed. Shambala108 ☎ 03:24, April 6, 2017 (UTC)

Series 10 page

There is a need to clear up a couple of things regarding this page and Tardis:Spoiler policy.

• Everything posted to the series 10 page must have a source. Anything that doesn't have a valid source will be removed. Repeated adding of unsourced material even after it has been removed is a violation of Tardis:Editing policy and could lead to a block.
• Do not, I repeat, do not post spoiler information in edit summaries. Edit summaries are visible to everyone; posting spoilers in the edit summary violates Tardis:Spoiler policy. Repeated violations of this nature could lead to a block.

Thanks for your attention. Shambala108 ☎ 00:11, April 11, 2017 (UTC)

"First three parter since series 3?"

Doesn't last series' Face the Raven, Heaven Sent, and Hell Bent constitute a three parter? TheTARDIScontroller ☎ 07:12, April 15, 2017 (UTC)