Talk:The Doctor's TARDIS: Difference between revisions
Stardizzy2 (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:a popular fan theory. I think that one of the novels, audios, etc., has addressed this, but I don't know what specific ones, if any. --[[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 22:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC) | :a popular fan theory. I think that one of the novels, audios, etc., has addressed this, but I don't know what specific ones, if any. --[[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 22:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
==2010== | |||
What was wrong with me edit? [[User:The Doctor Forever|The Doctor Forever]] 07:53, 25 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:53, 25 July 2009
"not inconceivable " this seems to contradict itself. should it be changed? TARDY- No Im Not Late 01:07, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
speed in the vortex
Some people point out that in the opening credits the tardis travels faster in the red vortex than in the blue one.
Vortex colours;
- Red= tardis traveling into the future
- Blue=travel into the past
The time winds flow into the relative future so more energy is required to travel into the past and the tardis goes slower. --Reecei 09:56, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
- Can you cite a source for this? (ie a TV/novel/audio drama/comic/short story etc) (Other than it being a theory?) --Tangerineduel 13:48, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Chameleon circuit
Whilst the circuit is broken, could it still be said that the exterior of the TARDIS still functions to a limited degree or still capable of minor alterations? It would explain the various changes in the design over the different years and props (compare the TARDIS in Spearhead from Space to Rose). Taccer 07 21:37, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- a popular fan theory. I think that one of the novels, audios, etc., has addressed this, but I don't know what specific ones, if any. --Stardizzy2 22:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
2010
What was wrong with me edit? The Doctor Forever 07:53, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
