Talk:Friend from the Future (TV story): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Tag: sourceedit |
Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:: It's been a week now since my original comment and nobody has objected. I'll change the template to a Speedy rename. --[[User:Borisashton|Borisashton]] [[User talk:Borisashton|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:14, April 23, 2017 (UTC) | :: It's been a week now since my original comment and nobody has objected. I'll change the template to a Speedy rename. --[[User:Borisashton|Borisashton]] [[User talk:Borisashton|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:14, April 23, 2017 (UTC) | ||
::: Well... given that it was in fact broadcast on TV (as it says on the page) I see no reason why it shouldn't be dabbed TV story. --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:38, April 23, 2017 (UTC) | ::: Well... given that it was in fact broadcast on TV (as it says on the page) I see no reason why it shouldn't be dabbed TV story. --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:38, April 23, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::: Yeah, this page really needs moving. The title, as it stands, is objectively inaccurate. [[Special:Contributions/217.43.40.225|217.43.40.225]]<sup>[[User talk:217.43.40.225#top|talk to me]]</sup> 10:19, May 1, 2017 (UTC) | |||
== Validity == | == Validity == | ||
Anyone wishing to argue for or against the story being valid should see [[Thread:214342]]. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|Talk]]) 20:45, April 16, 2017 (UTC) | Anyone wishing to argue for or against the story being valid should see [[Thread:214342]]. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|Talk]]) 20:45, April 16, 2017 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 10:19, 1 May 2017
Webcast?
I thought this was a TV story, first being broadcast on Match of the Day, and then later being released to the internet. --Borisashton ☎ 11:43, April 16, 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, this seems to be the case. If no one disagrees, I think we can move this up to a Template:Speedy rename. OS25 (Talk) 04:08, April 18, 2017 (UTC)
- It's been a week now since my original comment and nobody has objected. I'll change the template to a Speedy rename. --Borisashton ☎ 09:14, April 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Well... given that it was in fact broadcast on TV (as it says on the page) I see no reason why it shouldn't be dabbed TV story. --DCLM ☎ 09:38, April 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, this page really needs moving. The title, as it stands, is objectively inaccurate. 217.43.40.225talk to me 10:19, May 1, 2017 (UTC)
- Well... given that it was in fact broadcast on TV (as it says on the page) I see no reason why it shouldn't be dabbed TV story. --DCLM ☎ 09:38, April 23, 2017 (UTC)
- It's been a week now since my original comment and nobody has objected. I'll change the template to a Speedy rename. --Borisashton ☎ 09:14, April 23, 2017 (UTC)
Validity
Anyone wishing to argue for or against the story being valid should see Thread:214342. OS25 (Talk) 20:45, April 16, 2017 (UTC)
