Talk:Barbara Wright: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Novel) |
(→Novel) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Novel== | ==Novel== | ||
Although I have removed the reference to this in the two movie articles, where it did not belong, I think it's OK to mention the reference in [[I Am the Doctor: The Unauthorised Diaries of a Timelord]], provided it is marked as "unconfirmed" and "possibly apocryphal", relating to the book being non-canonical. I think it's interesting to have, and the fact the book was written by [[John Peel]] and distributed internationally (I bought it on Amazon in Canada) gives it a bit more prestige than the average fanfic. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 18:30, September 9, 2009 (UTC) | Although I have removed the reference to this in the two movie articles, where it did not belong, I think it's OK to mention the reference in [[I Am the Doctor: The Unauthorised Diaries of a Timelord]], provided it is marked as "unconfirmed" and "possibly apocryphal", relating to the book being non-canonical. I think it's interesting to have, and the fact the book was written by [[John Peel]] and distributed internationally (I bought it on Amazon in Canada) gives it a bit more prestige than the average fanfic. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 18:30, September 9, 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I don't think this information should be included in the main body of the article. In the 'Behind the Scenes' section would perhaps be okay, but as the [[Talk:I Am the Doctor: The Unauthorised Diaries of a Timelord|discussion]] on the 'I am the Doctor' page has lead, there is some contention on where this book stands. It's a commercial product correct? So it's an unlicensed, unofficial and unauthorised work. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 05:19, September 10, 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:19, 10 September 2009
Novel
Although I have removed the reference to this in the two movie articles, where it did not belong, I think it's OK to mention the reference in I Am the Doctor: The Unauthorised Diaries of a Timelord, provided it is marked as "unconfirmed" and "possibly apocryphal", relating to the book being non-canonical. I think it's interesting to have, and the fact the book was written by John Peel and distributed internationally (I bought it on Amazon in Canada) gives it a bit more prestige than the average fanfic. 23skidoo 18:30, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think this information should be included in the main body of the article. In the 'Behind the Scenes' section would perhaps be okay, but as the discussion on the 'I am the Doctor' page has lead, there is some contention on where this book stands. It's a commercial product correct? So it's an unlicensed, unofficial and unauthorised work. --Tangerineduel 05:19, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
