Category talk:Traitors: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Let me quote a passage from [[T:CAT NAMES]]: "''Above all else, category names must not be open to multiple interpretation, and must be free of any bias or value judgements.''"<br />--[[user:SmallerOnTheOutside|SOTO]] [[User talk:SmallerOnTheOutside|☎]] 04:48, July 30, 2013 (UTC) | Let me quote a passage from [[T:CAT NAMES]]: "''Above all else, category names must not be open to multiple interpretation, and must be free of any bias or value judgements.''"<br />--[[user:SmallerOnTheOutside|SOTO]] [[User talk:SmallerOnTheOutside|☎]] 04:48, July 30, 2013 (UTC) | ||
:Proposed deletion tag added. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:09, July 25, 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:09, 25 July 2017
A lil' bit too biased?
Surely "traitor" is a little too subjective for a category — one side's traitor is another's hero. I mean, just take a look at The Daleks' Master Plan. Here's a list of all the people that were called traitor in that serial (the ones that I caught, anyway):
- Zephon (self-applied)
- Bret Vyon (by Mavic Chen and Lizan, and later Sara Kingdom)
- Kert Gantry (by Chen and Lizan)
- Daxtar (by the Doctor and Bret Vyon)
- The entire TARDIS crew including Sara (by Chen)
- Mavic Chen (by Sara)
Practically the entire cast is at some point named a traitor by the opposing side!
Now. Let's see who in that whole list actually has the traitor category applied: of course, Daxtar and Chen. This is extremely biased towards the Doctor and his allies. Aren't we supposed to present an unbiased view of the DWU?
Let me quote a passage from T:CAT NAMES: "Above all else, category names must not be open to multiple interpretation, and must be free of any bias or value judgements."
--SOTO ☎ 04:48, July 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Proposed deletion tag added. Shambala108 ☎ 02:09, July 25, 2017 (UTC)
