Talk:Series 11 (Doctor Who 2005): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
::If they're April Fools jokes, then they're not even rumors, so why put them on the page? [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:49, April 1, 2018 (UTC) | ::If they're April Fools jokes, then they're not even rumors, so why put them on the page? [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:49, April 1, 2018 (UTC) | ||
::: I agree with Shambala108, April Fools jokes shouldn’t be put on articles. Unless it is central to a plot line, but then it’s not a real April Fools joke. [[User:TheTARDISLegilimens|TheTARDISLegilimens]] [[User talk:TheTARDISLegilimens|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:44, April 1, 2018 (UTC) | ::: I agree with Shambala108, April Fools jokes shouldn’t be put on articles. Unless it is central to a plot line, but then it’s not a real April Fools joke. [[User:TheTARDISLegilimens|TheTARDISLegilimens]] [[User talk:TheTARDISLegilimens|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:44, April 1, 2018 (UTC) | ||
:::: I concur with Shambala108 and TheTARDISLegilimens. [[User:GusF|GusF]] [[User talk:GusF|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:57, April 1, 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:57, 1 April 2018
Please note that, per Tardis:Spoiler policy, spoilers may not be posted on this talk page. Spoilers are only allowed on the Series 11 page itself.
Peculiar edits
I'm not sure if this is the place I should be writing - but I suggest locking this page and only allowing registered users to edit it. I keep coming across peculiar edits by those without accounts and I don't get why. StevieGLiverpool ☎ 16:27, November 14, 2017 (UTC)
- No. What they need to do is exile all these different accounts clearly used by the exact same person. They usually have a long weird code for a username. I tried to tell the person off, but I was told to do something real complicated. --DCLM ☎ 17:01, November 14, 2017 (UTC)
- The page has been protected. Shambala108 ☎ 17:25, November 14, 2017 (UTC)
- Just to clarify one thing. I strongly suspect that the "long weird code" you mention is just their IP address in the recently rolled out IPv6 format. Thus, attempts to contact such a person may well be futile as they do not receive notifications. This can also explain the changes in the observed user descriptions: these are different IP addresses rather than multiple accounts. Amorkuz ☎ 21:16, November 14, 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's what I thought, so there should be no more accusations from users that any of these anonymous users are the same one. That's up to the admins to decide. Thanks, Shambala108 ☎ 21:23, November 14, 2017 (UTC)
- Just to clarify one thing. I strongly suspect that the "long weird code" you mention is just their IP address in the recently rolled out IPv6 format. Thus, attempts to contact such a person may well be futile as they do not receive notifications. This can also explain the changes in the observed user descriptions: these are different IP addresses rather than multiple accounts. Amorkuz ☎ 21:16, November 14, 2017 (UTC)
- The page has been protected. Shambala108 ☎ 17:25, November 14, 2017 (UTC)
April Fool's
What do we do about April Fool's jokes surrounding the new series? I've come across two already. --DCLM ☎ 11:24, April 1, 2018 (UTC)
- I would stick them in the Rumours section but explicitly state it was an April Fool. --Borisashton ☎ 13:27, April 1, 2018 (UTC)
- If they're April Fools jokes, then they're not even rumors, so why put them on the page? Shambala108 ☎ 13:49, April 1, 2018 (UTC)
- I agree with Shambala108, April Fools jokes shouldn’t be put on articles. Unless it is central to a plot line, but then it’s not a real April Fools joke. TheTARDISLegilimens ☎ 14:44, April 1, 2018 (UTC)
- If they're April Fools jokes, then they're not even rumors, so why put them on the page? Shambala108 ☎ 13:49, April 1, 2018 (UTC)
