Talk:Me

Title

This page should be called Ashildr because she is the only DWU character with that name. CybermanFan ☎ 11:36, October 18, 2015 (UTC)CybermanFanCybermanFan ☎ 11:36, October 18, 2015 (UTC)

As far as I know, whether this is the the only character with that name or not articles with only one name should mention their first episode of appearance. Let an admin correct me if I'm wrong. --DCLM ☎ 11:59, October 18, 2015 (UTC)

Per Tardis:Characters with one name, we do future-proof common names of characters with a dab term. This case depends on whether the name Ashildr might possibly be used in other stories in the future. Shambala108 ☎ 14:38, October 18, 2015 (UTC)

Page were moved by new contributor. I left a message on his talk page. --DCLM ☎ 15:21, October 18, 2015 (UTC)

The page is now located at Ashildr. If on the off-chance that we get another Ashildr at some point, the page will be moved then as necessary. And just to emphasize, only admins are allowed to move pages. Please see Thread:128198 for details. Shambala108 ☎ 18:28, October 18, 2015 (UTC)

Of course the main question now is if the page should be moved to some form of "Me." OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 23:32, November 21, 2015 (UTC)

I believe it should. Me is the name she goes by for 2/3 stories and in-universe she's been going by that name for centuries. It's also the name most characters know her by: in TWWL everyone except the Doctor called her Lady Me and in FtR everyone except the Doctor and Clara call her Mayor Me. Mewiet ☎ 23:40, November 22, 2015 (UTC)

human-Mire Hybrid

can she actually be considered a human-Mire hybrid? yes, the technology is Mire but it was reprogrammed by the Doctor, and that wouldn't make her a "human-Mire-Time Lord" hybrid now, would it? RiddleTC ☎ 11:50, October 25, 2015 (UTC)

Image

Her profile image is the exact same as the one for The Girl who Died. Should it not be updated and also different to that page to avoid being repetitive also it is a little too closeup and doesn't show her change of heart from no longer being cynical at the end of the Women who lived? Snivystorm ☎ 11:51, October 25, 2015 (UTC)

I've uploaded an image from TWWL. The juxtaposition of the shadows cinematography represent the dubious nature of the character. OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 00:10, November 30, 2015 (UTC)

19th century

What is the evidence that she's been seen in the 19th century for her to be put in this category?– The preceding unsigned comment was added by Amorkuz (talk • contribs) .