User talk:TheOtherJenny: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(→‎Reply placeholder: new section)
Line 26: Line 26:


== Reply placeholder ==
== Reply placeholder ==
Hi, I do not want you to think that I am ignoring you, so I'm leaving this short note that I do not have time this week for the wiki at all. I'll provide a real reply hopefully soon. [[User:Amorkuz|Amorkuz]] [[User talk:Amorkuz|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 11:17, August 6, 2018 (UTC)
: To cut the long story short. The reason I undid your edits was that you removed information from the page. One can try to untangle a narrative, yes. But one should not ignore any [[T:VS|valid]] information that does not fit into this narrative. DW has many continuity holes. This wiki would be very much incomplete, if we only allow consistent narrative. For instance, you removed the following passage "As the Doctor was already dying from chronal starvation" sourced to ''[[Spiral Scratch (novel)|Spiral Scratch]]'', but this wiki treats all media as equal. As for McCoy playing the Sixth Doctor, it is a well-established fact that Colin Baker did not want to return for filming the regeneration scene, and McCoy had to put on a wig and lie there instead. I'm not entirely sure how a correct fact can be hair-splitting. When Tom Baker returned as the Curator, thus, becoming an actor who played two incarnations of the Doctor, it is McCoy he was compared to. This is part of ''Doctor Who'' lore. We have no right to remove this information from the wiki.
: To summarise, I do not mind you "cleaning up", as you say, the section about the Sixth Doctor regeneration. But it must be done in such a way that no (correct) information currently present is lost in the process and so that all valid sources are taken into account and given equal weight, see [[Tardis:Neutral point of view]].


Hi, I do not want you to think that I am ignoring you, so I'm leaving this short note that I do not have time this week for the wiki at all. I'll provide a real reply hopefully soon. [[User:Amorkuz|Amorkuz]] [[User talk:Amorkuz|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 11:17, August 6, 2018 (UTC)
: And, finally, it is not the case that every event in [[Doctor Who universe]] can be cleaned up. Some are inherently contradictory. ''Doctor Who'' is not a coherent universe, not by a long shot. In case of doubt, better to state all things as alternative accounts, close to the text than to interpret and massage facts until they fit. [[User:Amorkuz|Amorkuz]] [[User talk:Amorkuz|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:37, August 12, 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:37, 12 August 2018

Welcome to the Tardis:About TheOtherJenny

Thanks for your edits! We hope you'll keep on editing with us. This is a great time to have joined us, because now you can play the Game of Rassilon with us and win cool stuff! Well, okay, badges. That have no monetary value. And that largely only you can see. But still: they're cool!

We've got a couple of important quirks for a Wikia wiki, so let's get them out of the way first.
British English, please
We generally use British English round these parts, so if you're American, please be sure you set your spell checker to BrEng, and take a gander at our spelling cheat card.
Spoilers aren't cool
We have a strict definition of "spoiler" that you may find a bit unusual. Basically, a spoiler, to us, is anything that comes from a story which has not been released yet. So, even if you've got some info from a BBC press release or official trailer, it basically can't be referenced here. In other words, you gotta wait until the episode has finished its premiere broadcast to start editing about its contents. Please check the spoiler policy for more details.
Other useful stuff
Aside from those two things, we also have some pages that you should probably read when you get a chance, like:

If you're brand new to wiki editing — and we all were, once! —  you probably want to check out these tutorials at Wikipedia, the world's largest wiki:

Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this:
~ ~ ~ ~

Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask on my talk page. Revanvolatrelundar 03:02, April 14, 2018 (UTC)

Reply placeholder

Hi, I do not want you to think that I am ignoring you, so I'm leaving this short note that I do not have time this week for the wiki at all. I'll provide a real reply hopefully soon. Amorkuz 11:17, August 6, 2018 (UTC)

To cut the long story short. The reason I undid your edits was that you removed information from the page. One can try to untangle a narrative, yes. But one should not ignore any valid information that does not fit into this narrative. DW has many continuity holes. This wiki would be very much incomplete, if we only allow consistent narrative. For instance, you removed the following passage "As the Doctor was already dying from chronal starvation" sourced to Spiral Scratch, but this wiki treats all media as equal. As for McCoy playing the Sixth Doctor, it is a well-established fact that Colin Baker did not want to return for filming the regeneration scene, and McCoy had to put on a wig and lie there instead. I'm not entirely sure how a correct fact can be hair-splitting. When Tom Baker returned as the Curator, thus, becoming an actor who played two incarnations of the Doctor, it is McCoy he was compared to. This is part of Doctor Who lore. We have no right to remove this information from the wiki.
To summarise, I do not mind you "cleaning up", as you say, the section about the Sixth Doctor regeneration. But it must be done in such a way that no (correct) information currently present is lost in the process and so that all valid sources are taken into account and given equal weight, see Tardis:Neutral point of view.
And, finally, it is not the case that every event in Doctor Who universe can be cleaned up. Some are inherently contradictory. Doctor Who is not a coherent universe, not by a long shot. In case of doubt, better to state all things as alternative accounts, close to the text than to interpret and massage facts until they fit. Amorkuz 22:37, August 12, 2018 (UTC)