Talk:Mab: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
NateBumber (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(→Mabs) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: I mean, from where I'm standing, it seems like two "Doctor Who universe-ifications" of the same mythological character. I doubt [[Andy Lane]] had ''[[Funhouse (comic story)|Funhouse]]'' in mind when he wrote ''[[All-Consuming Fire (novel)|All-Consuming Fire]]'', but we cover both "versions" of [[Sherlock Holmes]] on the same page nonetheless; I think the same logic would apply here. – [[User:NateBumber|N8]] [[User_talk:NateBumber|☎]] 13:23, September 4, 2018 (UTC) | : I mean, from where I'm standing, it seems like two "Doctor Who universe-ifications" of the same mythological character. I doubt [[Andy Lane]] had ''[[Funhouse (comic story)|Funhouse]]'' in mind when he wrote ''[[All-Consuming Fire (novel)|All-Consuming Fire]]'', but we cover both "versions" of [[Sherlock Holmes]] on the same page nonetheless; I think the same logic would apply here. – [[User:NateBumber|N8]] [[User_talk:NateBumber|☎]] 13:23, September 4, 2018 (UTC) | ||
:: How about at least taking stock of all the manifestations we have in DWU here on this talk page. I'm a bit concerned about rushing into things. I almost renamed the page based on your suggestion when I realised you want to merge the pages. [[User:Amorkuz|Amorkuz]] [[User talk:Amorkuz|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:24, September 4, 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:24, 4 September 2018
Mabs
Are we sure it is the same one as in The Shadows of Avalon (novel)? There seems to be a tangle of characters both in the real world and in DWU, including Titania, Mab, Lady of the Ivy. I was going to investigate it just to be on the safe side. Amorkuz ☎ 13:17, September 4, 2018 (UTC)
- I mean, from where I'm standing, it seems like two "Doctor Who universe-ifications" of the same mythological character. I doubt Andy Lane had Funhouse in mind when he wrote All-Consuming Fire, but we cover both "versions" of Sherlock Holmes on the same page nonetheless; I think the same logic would apply here. – N8 ☎ 13:23, September 4, 2018 (UTC)