Talk:K9's Question Time (TV story): Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Tag: sourceedit
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:


== Invalid ==
== Invalid ==
Do people agree with is being labelled invalid? [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER| - Sir DENCH-and-PALMER ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:30, December 18, 2016 (UTC)
Do people agree with is being labelled invalid? [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER| - Sir DENCH-and-PALMER ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:30, December 18, 2016 (UTC)
:I do. Stargazing Live is not a DW show. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:34, December 19, 2016 (UTC)
:I do. Stargazing Live is not a DW show. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:34, December 19, 2016 (UTC)
::I agree with its invalidity. However if we consider it in a "Children in Need" sense (a story being broadcast during another show), then is it still invalid? [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER| - Sir DENCH-and-PALMER ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 07:37, December 19, 2016 (UTC)
::I agree with its invalidity. However if we consider it in a "Children in Need" sense (a story being broadcast during another show), then is it still invalid? [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER| - Sir DENCH-and-PALMER ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 07:37, December 19, 2016 (UTC)
:::You know, I see this discussion never had a conclusion, and I'd very much like to see what part of [[Tardis:Valid sources]] rules out stories which happened to be released packaged inside a non-''Doctor Who''-branded show. As long as the story's officially released and makes sense on its own, why should we care in what context it was released?
:::There's [[Death Is the Only Answer (TV story)|precedent]] for shorts released in the middle of non-narrative TV specials, but presented as stories of their own which can be watched for their own sakes, to be valid. And wouldn't a rule of this sort, if extended to non-TV media, rule out short stories printed in non-''DW'' anthologies — i.e. ''[[Decalog 5: Wonders]]''.
:::It may, of course, be that ''K9's Question Time'' is invalid for other reasons, for all we know. Certainly, going by the title, it might well be fourth-wall-breaking in the mould of ''[[Search Out Space]]''. But I'm puzzled by the suggestion that “it was broadcast inside a non-DW show” is enough to declare it invalid, especially with the ''Children in Need'' precedent cited earlier. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:21, May 31, 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:21, 31 May 2019

Invalid

Do people agree with is being labelled invalid? - Sir DENCH-and-PALMER 22:30, December 18, 2016 (UTC)

I do. Stargazing Live is not a DW show. Shambala108 00:34, December 19, 2016 (UTC)
I agree with its invalidity. However if we consider it in a "Children in Need" sense (a story being broadcast during another show), then is it still invalid? - Sir DENCH-and-PALMER 07:37, December 19, 2016 (UTC)
You know, I see this discussion never had a conclusion, and I'd very much like to see what part of Tardis:Valid sources rules out stories which happened to be released packaged inside a non-Doctor Who-branded show. As long as the story's officially released and makes sense on its own, why should we care in what context it was released?
There's precedent for shorts released in the middle of non-narrative TV specials, but presented as stories of their own which can be watched for their own sakes, to be valid. And wouldn't a rule of this sort, if extended to non-TV media, rule out short stories printed in non-DW anthologies — i.e. Decalog 5: Wonders.
It may, of course, be that K9's Question Time is invalid for other reasons, for all we know. Certainly, going by the title, it might well be fourth-wall-breaking in the mould of Search Out Space. But I'm puzzled by the suggestion that “it was broadcast inside a non-DW show” is enough to declare it invalid, especially with the Children in Need precedent cited earlier. --Scrooge MacDuck 17:21, May 31, 2019 (UTC)