Talk:K9's Question Time (TV story): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Tag: sourceedit |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Invalid == | == Invalid == | ||
Do people agree with is being labelled invalid? [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER| - Sir DENCH-and-PALMER ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:30, December 18, 2016 (UTC) | Do people agree with is being labelled invalid? [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER| - Sir DENCH-and-PALMER ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:30, December 18, 2016 (UTC) | ||
:I do. Stargazing Live is not a DW show. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:34, December 19, 2016 (UTC) | :I do. Stargazing Live is not a DW show. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:34, December 19, 2016 (UTC) | ||
::I agree with its invalidity. However if we consider it in a "Children in Need" sense (a story being broadcast during another show), then is it still invalid? [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER| - Sir DENCH-and-PALMER ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 07:37, December 19, 2016 (UTC) | ::I agree with its invalidity. However if we consider it in a "Children in Need" sense (a story being broadcast during another show), then is it still invalid? [[User:DENCH-and-PALMER| - Sir DENCH-and-PALMER ]] [[User talk:DENCH-and-PALMER|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 07:37, December 19, 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::You know, I see this discussion never had a conclusion, and I'd very much like to see what part of [[Tardis:Valid sources]] rules out stories which happened to be released packaged inside a non-''Doctor Who''-branded show. As long as the story's officially released and makes sense on its own, why should we care in what context it was released? | |||
:::There's [[Death Is the Only Answer (TV story)|precedent]] for shorts released in the middle of non-narrative TV specials, but presented as stories of their own which can be watched for their own sakes, to be valid. And wouldn't a rule of this sort, if extended to non-TV media, rule out short stories printed in non-''DW'' anthologies — i.e. ''[[Decalog 5: Wonders]]''. | |||
:::It may, of course, be that ''K9's Question Time'' is invalid for other reasons, for all we know. Certainly, going by the title, it might well be fourth-wall-breaking in the mould of ''[[Search Out Space]]''. But I'm puzzled by the suggestion that “it was broadcast inside a non-DW show” is enough to declare it invalid, especially with the ''Children in Need'' precedent cited earlier. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:21, May 31, 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:21, 31 May 2019
Invalid
Do people agree with is being labelled invalid? - Sir DENCH-and-PALMER ☎ 22:30, December 18, 2016 (UTC)
- I do. Stargazing Live is not a DW show. Shambala108 ☎ 00:34, December 19, 2016 (UTC)
- I agree with its invalidity. However if we consider it in a "Children in Need" sense (a story being broadcast during another show), then is it still invalid? - Sir DENCH-and-PALMER ☎ 07:37, December 19, 2016 (UTC)
- You know, I see this discussion never had a conclusion, and I'd very much like to see what part of Tardis:Valid sources rules out stories which happened to be released packaged inside a non-Doctor Who-branded show. As long as the story's officially released and makes sense on its own, why should we care in what context it was released?
- I agree with its invalidity. However if we consider it in a "Children in Need" sense (a story being broadcast during another show), then is it still invalid? - Sir DENCH-and-PALMER ☎ 07:37, December 19, 2016 (UTC)
- There's precedent for shorts released in the middle of non-narrative TV specials, but presented as stories of their own which can be watched for their own sakes, to be valid. And wouldn't a rule of this sort, if extended to non-TV media, rule out short stories printed in non-DW anthologies — i.e. Decalog 5: Wonders.
- It may, of course, be that K9's Question Time is invalid for other reasons, for all we know. Certainly, going by the title, it might well be fourth-wall-breaking in the mould of Search Out Space. But I'm puzzled by the suggestion that “it was broadcast inside a non-DW show” is enough to declare it invalid, especially with the Children in Need precedent cited earlier. --Scrooge MacDuck ☎ 17:21, May 31, 2019 (UTC)