Forum:2010 main page redesign: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
Bigshowbower (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
seems good, though i think we should have a big debate about what should change, what shouldn't etc [[User:Excalibur-117|Excalibur-117]] 13:16, January 2, 2010 (UTC) | seems good, though i think we should have a big debate about what should change, what shouldn't etc [[User:Excalibur-117|Excalibur-117]] 13:16, January 2, 2010 (UTC) | ||
I agree, but can I make a suggestion regarding the image placeholder thingys, instead of having the caption to the side of the image, what about having it in the middle, and a colour code for Doctor Who, Torchwood and Sarah Jane Adventures, just for the heading boxes. All in all looks good. Good Work.--[[User:Bigshowbower|Bigshowbower]] 13:33, January 2, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:33, 2 January 2010
Index → Panopticon → 2010 main page redesign
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
Ready for the new series, I have designed a new home page here, what do you think? --Rbfskywalker 12:32, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
seems good, though i think we should have a big debate about what should change, what shouldn't etc Excalibur-117 13:16, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
I agree, but can I make a suggestion regarding the image placeholder thingys, instead of having the caption to the side of the image, what about having it in the middle, and a colour code for Doctor Who, Torchwood and Sarah Jane Adventures, just for the heading boxes. All in all looks good. Good Work.--Bigshowbower 13:33, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
