Talk:The Doctor's psychic paper: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::::OK then... genius... what does this mythical ‘Doctor Who canon’ look like? 🙄 [[Special:Contributions/86.12.165.34|86.12.165.34]]<sup>[[User talk:86.12.165.34#top|talk to me]]</sup> 12:41, February 5, 2020 (UTC) | :::::OK then... genius... what does this mythical ‘Doctor Who canon’ look like? 🙄 [[Special:Contributions/86.12.165.34|86.12.165.34]]<sup>[[User talk:86.12.165.34#top|talk to me]]</sup> 12:41, February 5, 2020 (UTC) | ||
::::86 is correct as far as this wiki is concerned as per [[T:CANON]]. Additionally, this wiki already considers stories such as ''The Night Walkers'' completely valid. --[[User:Borisashton|Borisashton]] [[User talk:Borisashton|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 12:46, February 5, 2020 (UTC) | ::::86 is correct as far as this wiki is concerned as per [[T:CANON]]. Additionally, this wiki already considers stories such as ''The Night Walkers'' completely valid. --[[User:Borisashton|Borisashton]] [[User talk:Borisashton|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 12:46, February 5, 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::::And thus there IS a canon. So saying there isn't is not correct. --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 12:48, February 5, 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:48, 5 February 2020
Season 6B
I just had a thought. If the Celestial Intervention Agency created the psychic paper as it states, and the fact that the Doctor has one themselves, does that not prove definitely that Season 6B is actual canon as Season 6B tells several tales of the Second Doctor was halted mid-regeneration to go work for them for an extensive period of time. And at the termination of that working period was either given, or nicked a psychic paper for themselves. --DCLM ☎ 20:06, February 3, 2020 (UTC)
- I mean, there's a lot of debate about whether S6B is part of canon or not, but wouldn't this prove that it is definite canon? --DCLM ☎ 20:20, February 3, 2020 (UTC)
- Doctor Who doesn’t have a ‘canon’ 86.12.165.34talk to me 12:32, February 5, 2020 (UTC)
- Actually incorrect. --DCLM ☎ 12:40, February 5, 2020 (UTC)
- If anyone can answer this properly, I'll be happy to accept whatever. --DCLM ☎ 12:40, February 5, 2020 (UTC)
- OK then... genius... what does this mythical ‘Doctor Who canon’ look like? 🙄 86.12.165.34talk to me 12:41, February 5, 2020 (UTC)
- 86 is correct as far as this wiki is concerned as per T:CANON. Additionally, this wiki already considers stories such as The Night Walkers completely valid. --Borisashton ☎ 12:46, February 5, 2020 (UTC)
- If anyone can answer this properly, I'll be happy to accept whatever. --DCLM ☎ 12:40, February 5, 2020 (UTC)
- Actually incorrect. --DCLM ☎ 12:40, February 5, 2020 (UTC)
- Doctor Who doesn’t have a ‘canon’ 86.12.165.34talk to me 12:32, February 5, 2020 (UTC)