Howling:Series 5 Dalek Story: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Catkind121 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Yeah I've heard this and I think its true about Daleks helping Churchill but its not a two parter its only episode 3. Episode 4 + 5 is the return of River Song and the weeping angels. -- [[User:Michael Downey|Michael Downey]] 13:02, January 11, 2010 (UTC) | Yeah I've heard this and I think its true about Daleks helping Churchill but its not a two parter its only episode 3. Episode 4 + 5 is the return of River Song and the weeping angels. -- [[User:Michael Downey|Michael Downey]] 13:02, January 11, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Well that wou;ld make this one the second 1 part Dalek story. But it would be written by Mark Gattis who wrote the awful Idiots Lantern. --Catkind121 14:33, January 11, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:33, 11 January 2010
I heard from my friend, whose stage coach teacher goes to the doctor who recording things that the dalek story this year is, i think, a two parter (probably around episodes 4 and 5, judging how they;re in the trailer and they haven't finished filming yet). Apparantely, Churchill has the Daleks working for him (the grey ones) and is going to use them against the Nazis in World War Two. Thus, the Doctor is forced to work with Hitler to defeat the Daleks ... kind of turning the idea on it's head, but oh well ... slightly controversial if Hitler is shown to be nice ... yet kind of controversial if he isn't shown to be nice as well. Oh, well. That's chris chibnall/ steven moffat's problem.
Yeah I've heard this and I think its true about Daleks helping Churchill but its not a two parter its only episode 3. Episode 4 + 5 is the return of River Song and the weeping angels. -- Michael Downey 13:02, January 11, 2010 (UTC)
Well that wou;ld make this one the second 1 part Dalek story. But it would be written by Mark Gattis who wrote the awful Idiots Lantern. --Catkind121 14:33, January 11, 2010 (UTC)
