emailconfirmed, Administrators
129,644
edits
More actions
no edit summary
(adding top nav) |
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
* Personal attacks do not include civil language used to describe an editor's actions, and when made without involving their personal character, should not be construed as personal attacks. Stating "Your statement is a personal attack..." is not itself a personal attack — it is a statement regarding the actions of the user, not a statement about the user. | * Personal attacks do not include civil language used to describe an editor's actions, and when made without involving their personal character, should not be construed as personal attacks. Stating "Your statement is a personal attack..." is not itself a personal attack — it is a statement regarding the actions of the user, not a statement about the user. | ||
* A comment in an edit history such as "reverting vandalism" is not a personal attack. However, it is important to assume good faith when making such a comment — if the edit that is being reverted could be interpreted as a good-faith edit, then don't label it as vandalism. | * A comment in an edit history such as "reverting vandalism" is not a personal attack. However, it is important to assume good faith when making such a comment — if the edit that is being reverted could be interpreted as a good-faith edit, then don't label it as vandalism. | ||
* Questioning/determining whether an author/publisher has a license to produce DWU work is '''not''' a personal attack. It is an important part of determining [[Tardis:Valid sources|story validity]]. | |||
== Alternatives == | == Alternatives == | ||