Talk:The Descendants of Pompeii (webcast): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The statement that "An unspecified incarnation of the Doctor was revealed in a twist ending to have been silently watching the entire video call" is an assumption. It isn't '''actually''' revealed. Yes, it's the assumption that the story is leading you towards, but it isn't explicit. There is room for manoeuvre. Who knows? It could be any number of the Doctor's enemies fishing for information! [[Special:Contributions/109.149.158.122|109.149.158.122]]<sup>[[User talk:109.149.158.122#top|talk to me]]</sup> 00:27, May 19, 2020 (UTC) | The statement that "An unspecified incarnation of the Doctor was revealed in a twist ending to have been silently watching the entire video call" is an assumption. It isn't '''actually''' revealed. Yes, it's the assumption that the story is leading you towards, but it isn't explicit. There is room for manoeuvre. Who knows? It could be any number of the Doctor's enemies fishing for information! [[Special:Contributions/109.149.158.122|109.149.158.122]]<sup>[[User talk:109.149.158.122#top|talk to me]]</sup> 00:27, May 19, 2020 (UTC) | ||
:The use of the Doctor's theme on the soundtrack rather suggests that it's the Doctor. In terms of basic literacy from a RW perspective, I think it's clear that the Doctor is featured in this story. Whether we recognise that fact as valid in-universe is another matter, but the statement of which you speak is from an out-of-universe section. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:39, May 19, 2020 (UTC) | :The use of the Doctor's theme on the soundtrack rather suggests that it's the Doctor. In terms of basic literacy from a RW perspective, I think it's clear that the Doctor is featured in this story. Whether we recognise that fact as valid in-universe is another matter, but the statement of which you speak is from an out-of-universe section. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:39, May 19, 2020 (UTC) | ||
::Thanks for your reply. That's a reasonable explanation which could be used within the article. I'm not a regular here, so I'll leave it to those that are, but it'd be a useful point to make. Sorry, I don't know what 'RW' means. Would you mind elaborating? Whether these Lockdown episodes are canon is a really interesting point. Is that discussion being had anywhere? [[Special:Contributions/109.149.158.122|109.149.158.122]]<sup>[[User talk:109.149.158.122#top|talk to me]]</sup> 03:47, May 19, 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:47, 19 May 2020
The statement that "An unspecified incarnation of the Doctor was revealed in a twist ending to have been silently watching the entire video call" is an assumption. It isn't actually revealed. Yes, it's the assumption that the story is leading you towards, but it isn't explicit. There is room for manoeuvre. Who knows? It could be any number of the Doctor's enemies fishing for information! 109.149.158.122talk to me 00:27, May 19, 2020 (UTC)
- The use of the Doctor's theme on the soundtrack rather suggests that it's the Doctor. In terms of basic literacy from a RW perspective, I think it's clear that the Doctor is featured in this story. Whether we recognise that fact as valid in-universe is another matter, but the statement of which you speak is from an out-of-universe section. --Scrooge MacDuck ☎ 00:39, May 19, 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. That's a reasonable explanation which could be used within the article. I'm not a regular here, so I'll leave it to those that are, but it'd be a useful point to make. Sorry, I don't know what 'RW' means. Would you mind elaborating? Whether these Lockdown episodes are canon is a really interesting point. Is that discussion being had anywhere? 109.149.158.122talk to me 03:47, May 19, 2020 (UTC)