Talk:Dr. Men: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
DiSoRiEnTeD1 (talk | contribs) (→Cannon) |
Borisashton (talk | contribs) (→Cannon) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Should doctor men be considered a valid source? Could it be considered a spoof? [[User:EpicMeeper4991|EpicMeeper4991]] [[User talk:EpicMeeper4991|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:48, April 2, 2020 (UTC) | Should doctor men be considered a valid source? Could it be considered a spoof? [[User:EpicMeeper4991|EpicMeeper4991]] [[User talk:EpicMeeper4991|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:48, April 2, 2020 (UTC) | ||
:these stories seem very much like [[Alien Babies!]] which is invalid. [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:44, May 29, 2020 (UTC) | :these stories seem very much like [[Alien Babies!]] which is invalid. [[User:DiSoRiEnTeD1|DiSoRiEnTeD1]] [[User talk:DiSoRiEnTeD1|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:44, May 29, 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: As [[User:CzechOut]] explained at [[Thread:215070]] this series is perfectly valid by wiki standards. --[[User:Borisashton|Borisashton]] [[User talk:Borisashton|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:51, May 29, 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:51, 29 May 2020
Webcasts
I'm not convinced that we need a page on the "webcast" of the Twelfth Doctor. It's literally just the cover of his book animated in a loop. It's only a couple frames away from not being something that anyone would consider. OS25 (Talk) 17:28, April 26, 2017 (UTC)
- I added it because it was on the Facebook page and as you said, it was an animated a little bit. My original intention was to cover it as a marketing campaign, but it can be removed if you want on the reasons you suggested. --Borisashton ☎ 17:35, April 26, 2017 (UTC)
Cannon
Should doctor men be considered a valid source? Could it be considered a spoof? EpicMeeper4991 ☎ 18:48, April 2, 2020 (UTC)
- these stories seem very much like Alien Babies! which is invalid. DiSoRiEnTeD1 ☎ 16:44, May 29, 2020 (UTC)
- As User:CzechOut explained at Thread:215070 this series is perfectly valid by wiki standards. --Borisashton ☎ 16:51, May 29, 2020 (UTC)
