Forum:Whitey and Red Person: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Catkind121 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:A quote of Moffat about the red people would be nice. Can you find one? -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 07:01, February 15, 2010 (UTC) | :A quote of Moffat about the red people would be nice. Can you find one? -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 07:01, February 15, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Whitey sounds very racist and so does Red Person why not call them White Alien and Red Alien. One thing that may be related that I don't understand is they come from New Earth whcih exsists in 5 billion years time what arethey doing in 2010. Same with the Hath, I sure hope we do find the history of th Red Aliens. |
Revision as of 09:39, 15 February 2010
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
The pages Whitey and Red Person are proposed deletions. Why? They are both recurring species in Doctor Who and need pages on them. The Red People are even going to be given a lead role in Series 5. So I vote to keep these articles because they have quite a bit of content, one has a photo and they are large parts of Doctor Who. Please don't delete these pages, because I think they're good. I'm A Hydroponic Tomato! Bigredrabbit (talk to me) 03:29, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
Same with Iceworld species. I'm A Hydroponic Tomato! Bigredrabbit (talk to me) 04:16, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
- A quote of Moffat about the red people would be nice. Can you find one? -- Noneofyourbusiness 07:01, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
Whitey sounds very racist and so does Red Person why not call them White Alien and Red Alien. One thing that may be related that I don't understand is they come from New Earth whcih exsists in 5 billion years time what arethey doing in 2010. Same with the Hath, I sure hope we do find the history of th Red Aliens.