Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,060
edits
Line 787: | Line 787: | ||
::I do realize that Rule 4 is traditionally the area for authorial intent to be relevant, this is more the area of "do we take this to be a good faith exception, given the intent of the authors". (Also, I think we have precedent for Rule 3 referring to something else entirely than leaks or subverting the medium the author intended, namely [[Burning with Optimism's Flames (anthology)|Wallowing in Pessimism's Mire]], but I ''still'' don't understand the precise reasoning behind that ruling and how to apply it to other cases, so that's just me guessing.) [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:18, November 23, 2020 (UTC) | ::I do realize that Rule 4 is traditionally the area for authorial intent to be relevant, this is more the area of "do we take this to be a good faith exception, given the intent of the authors". (Also, I think we have precedent for Rule 3 referring to something else entirely than leaks or subverting the medium the author intended, namely [[Burning with Optimism's Flames (anthology)|Wallowing in Pessimism's Mire]], but I ''still'' don't understand the precise reasoning behind that ruling and how to apply it to other cases, so that's just me guessing.) [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:18, November 23, 2020 (UTC) | ||
::::What "ruling" are you referring to here? --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:24, November 23, 2020 (UTC) |