Talk:Shrek: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Line 7: Line 7:


:::The above is true: [[T:NO RW]]. When in doubt, ask an [[admin]]. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:53, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
:::The above is true: [[T:NO RW]]. When in doubt, ask an [[admin]]. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:53, 5 April 2022 (UTC)


:::: @[[User:DrWHOCorrieFan|DrWHOCorrieFan]] - we don't decide to create pages based upon notability on this Wiki. One appearance, no, even a ''mention'' is ''more'' than enough grounds to create a page. Also, we wouldn't be using any real world information on these pages other than their names, which is expressly ''allowed'' so long as we mark the page with {{tlx|Conjecture}}: we have a ''massive'' amount of precendent, and none of it breaks [[T:NO RW]].
:::: @[[User:DrWHOCorrieFan|DrWHOCorrieFan]] - we don't decide to create pages based upon notability on this Wiki. One appearance, no, even a ''mention'' is ''more'' than enough grounds to create a page. Also, we wouldn't be using any real world information on these pages other than their names, which is expressly ''allowed'' so long as we mark the page with {{tlx|Conjecture}}: we have a ''massive'' amount of precendent, and none of it breaks [[T:NO RW]].
:::: @[[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] - users are perfectly allowed to ask other non-admin users for advice. Admins, while of course extremely knowledgable, are not of a higher rank than other equally-knowledgable non-admins. <div style="background-color:#0E234E; border: solid 0.5px gold; display: inline; white-space: nowrap;">[[doctorwho:user:Epsilon the Eternal|<span style="background:#0E234E; color:white"><code>Epsilon</code></span>]][[doctorwho:user talk:Epsilon the Eternal|📯]] [[doctorwho:special:Contributions/Epsilon the Eternal|📂]]</div> 14:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
:::: @[[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] - users are perfectly allowed to ask other non-admin users for advice. Admins, while of course extremely knowledgable, are not of a higher rank than other equally-knowledgable non-admins. <div style="background-color:#0E234E; border: solid 0.5px gold; display: inline; white-space: nowrap;">[[doctorwho:user:Epsilon the Eternal|<span style="background:#0E234E; color:white"><code>Epsilon</code></span>]][[doctorwho:user talk:Epsilon the Eternal|📯]] [[doctorwho:special:Contributions/Epsilon the Eternal|📂]]</div> 14:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:04, 5 April 2022

Characters shown on the poster?

Should the characters of Shrek, Donkey, Fiona, and the dragon have their own pages? They're fictional characters from the real world, much like other characters with their own pages. Cookieboy 2005 10:21, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

May be stretching it with Dragon, considering she looks like a blob on the cover due to the low quality, but you should be fine to create pages for these characters if you makes sure to add a {{Conjecture}} template. However, you would have to use "(fictional character)" as a dab term instead of "(Shrek)", as we don't cover Shrek. 12:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
First of all, why would these characters even need a page if this is their only appearance? Secondly, isn't that breaking some sort of rule about putting real-world information onto pages as their counterparts in the DWU could be completely different. DrWHOCorrieFan 12:33, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
The above is true: T:NO RW. When in doubt, ask an admin. Shambala108 13:53, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
@DrWHOCorrieFan - we don't decide to create pages based upon notability on this Wiki. One appearance, no, even a mention is more than enough grounds to create a page. Also, we wouldn't be using any real world information on these pages other than their names, which is expressly allowed so long as we mark the page with {{Conjecture}}: we have a massive amount of precendent, and none of it breaks T:NO RW.
@Shambala108 - users are perfectly allowed to ask other non-admin users for advice. Admins, while of course extremely knowledgable, are not of a higher rank than other equally-knowledgable non-admins. 14:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)