Talk:List of future releases: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 4: Line 4:


:: Whether they lean into the ''Who'' connection or not, we ''will'' cover the book if it's fully licensed, albeit as {{tlx|invalid}}; it is only because of the alleged legal issues that the audio series is not currently covered in some capacity. If new data on the Minister's legal status do in fact come to light as a result of this release, and clear up the prior suspicions that the Minister was to some degree a BBC-owned character and therefore illegally used in the audios, there will be no argument against creating pages for the audio series and, yes, the book. Although whether they're ''valid'' will perhaps be a discussion of its own. <span style="color: #baa3d6;font-family:Comic Sans;">[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']]</span> <span style="color: #baa3d6;">[[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]]</span> 09:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
:: Whether they lean into the ''Who'' connection or not, we ''will'' cover the book if it's fully licensed, albeit as {{tlx|invalid}}; it is only because of the alleged legal issues that the audio series is not currently covered in some capacity. If new data on the Minister's legal status do in fact come to light as a result of this release, and clear up the prior suspicions that the Minister was to some degree a BBC-owned character and therefore illegally used in the audios, there will be no argument against creating pages for the audio series and, yes, the book. Although whether they're ''valid'' will perhaps be a discussion of its own. <span style="color: #baa3d6;font-family:Comic Sans;">[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']]</span> <span style="color: #baa3d6;">[[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]]</span> 09:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
::: Thanks. I'll add it to the page because I don't think there's any possibility that Arcbeetle would publish something that isn't fully licensed. [[User:DrWHOCorrieFan|DrWHOCorrieFan]] [[User talk:DrWHOCorrieFan|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:41, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:41, 16 May 2022

there are one or two things on this page that have been realeased. Eudfgshjfhbjsdhfgdjsiu (usertalk:Eudfgshjfhbjsdhfgdjsiu) 6 April, 2020, 2:54

Should the upcoming Arcbeetle The Minister of Chance novel be added? I know this site has hang-ups about that series but knowing Arcbeetle they are going to lean heavily into the connections with Doctor Who. I think the fact that they're able to create a novel for the series shows that the legal issues that this site is concerned with aren't that problematic. DrWHOCorrieFan 09:32, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Whether they lean into the Who connection or not, we will cover the book if it's fully licensed, albeit as {{invalid}}; it is only because of the alleged legal issues that the audio series is not currently covered in some capacity. If new data on the Minister's legal status do in fact come to light as a result of this release, and clear up the prior suspicions that the Minister was to some degree a BBC-owned character and therefore illegally used in the audios, there will be no argument against creating pages for the audio series and, yes, the book. Although whether they're valid will perhaps be a discussion of its own. Scrooge MacDuck 09:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks. I'll add it to the page because I don't think there's any possibility that Arcbeetle would publish something that isn't fully licensed. DrWHOCorrieFan 09:41, 16 May 2022 (UTC)