Talk:The Fan Show: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(→Rename) Tag: sourceedit |
(→Coverage: new section) Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:::::Yeah, that was me. Sorry [[User:OncomingStorm12th|OncomingStorm12th]] [[User talk:OncomingStorm12th|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:32, October 25, 2016 (UTC) | :::::Yeah, that was me. Sorry [[User:OncomingStorm12th|OncomingStorm12th]] [[User talk:OncomingStorm12th|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:32, October 25, 2016 (UTC) | ||
::::::Page has been renamed ''[[The Fan Show]]''. ''[[Doctor Who: The Fan Show]]'' redirects here as well.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 19:50, October 25, 2016 (UTC) | ::::::Page has been renamed ''[[The Fan Show]]''. ''[[Doctor Who: The Fan Show]]'' redirects here as well.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 19:50, October 25, 2016 (UTC) | ||
== Coverage == | |||
I notice many episodes don't have pages. Is this because of [[people]] not bothering or because of an old [[:Category:Forums|forum]] debate? Personally, I believe that they should be fully covered, but I'm curious if there's been a decision against this. [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 10:08, 6 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:08, 6 June 2022
Rename
I think it should be renamed "Doctor Who: The Fan Show", given that that's what it is actually called. --DCLM ☎ 20:27, October 24, 2016 (UTC)
- At first, I also though that, but then I decided to add both possibilities because usually "Doctor Who" is kept out of page titles (like Legacy (video game), which is mostly referenced as "Doctor Who: Legacy" and Comic Creator, which is mostly referenced as "Doctor Who Comic Creator") OncomingStorm12th ☎ 20:31, October 24, 2016 (UTC)
- What I wanna know is why they are not called their actual titles. Then we could just as well change "Doctor Who and the Silurians" to be called "And the Silurians". --DCLM ☎ 20:42, October 24, 2016 (UTC)
- "Doctor Who and" is a very different situation to "Doctor Who:" I can't remember what the forum page was called right now, but it's long been decided that we truncate "Doctor Who:" from titles at Tardis.
× SOTO contribs ×°/↯/•] 💬•| {/-//: 20:48, October 24, 2016 (UTC)- It just seems a little weird. --DCLM ☎ 20:51, October 24, 2016 (UTC)
- Forum:Doctor Who prefix in titles, continued in Thread:117218 in the new forums.
× SOTO contribs ×°/↯/•] 💬•| {/-//: 20:55, October 24, 2016 (UTC)- Giving these threads, the name should definitely be The Fan Show then. OncomingStorm12th ☎ 21:00, October 24, 2016 (UTC)
- Forum:Doctor Who prefix in titles, continued in Thread:117218 in the new forums.
- It just seems a little weird. --DCLM ☎ 20:51, October 24, 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think you know what {{retitle}} is for. Also, please don't add a {{speedy rename}} while a rename discussion is still ongoing.
× SOTO contribs ×°/↯/•] 💬•| {/-//: 02:14, October 25, 2016 (UTC)- Just gonna say the "speedy rename" was not my doing. --DCLM ☎ 19:26, October 25, 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, that was me. Sorry OncomingStorm12th ☎ 19:32, October 25, 2016 (UTC)
- Page has been renamed The Fan Show. Doctor Who: The Fan Show redirects here as well.
× SOTO contribs ×°/↯/•] 💬•| {/-//: 19:50, October 25, 2016 (UTC)
- Page has been renamed The Fan Show. Doctor Who: The Fan Show redirects here as well.
- Yeah, that was me. Sorry OncomingStorm12th ☎ 19:32, October 25, 2016 (UTC)
- Just gonna say the "speedy rename" was not my doing. --DCLM ☎ 19:26, October 25, 2016 (UTC)
- "Doctor Who and" is a very different situation to "Doctor Who:" I can't remember what the forum page was called right now, but it's long been decided that we truncate "Doctor Who:" from titles at Tardis.
- What I wanna know is why they are not called their actual titles. Then we could just as well change "Doctor Who and the Silurians" to be called "And the Silurians". --DCLM ☎ 20:42, October 24, 2016 (UTC)
Coverage
I notice many episodes don't have pages. Is this because of people not bothering or because of an old forum debate? Personally, I believe that they should be fully covered, but I'm curious if there's been a decision against this. Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 10:08, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
