Forum:Non-canonical companion categories: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with '{{Forumheader|Panopticon}} We have the categories Category:Non-canonical companions and Category:Companions of non-canonical Doctors. Though their meanings can be take…') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|Panopticon}} | {{Forumheader|Panopticon}} | ||
We have the categories [[:Category:Non-canonical companions]] and [[:Category:Companions of non-canonical Doctors]]. Though their meanings can be taken as subtly different, the contents of the latter seem to me as though they'd fit perfectly into the former. Do you suppose we'd benefit from consolidating or nesting the categories, or should we keep them separate? [[User:Rob T Firefly|Rob T Firefly]] 20:19, April 20, 2010 (UTC) | We have the categories [[:Category:Non-canonical companions]] and [[:Category:Companions of non-canonical Doctors]]. Though their meanings can be taken as subtly different, the contents of the latter seem to me as though they'd fit perfectly into the former. Do you suppose we'd benefit from consolidating or nesting the categories, or should we keep them separate? [[User:Rob T Firefly|Rob T Firefly]] 20:19, April 20, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::I've marked the latter to be deleted. Clearly, Cat:NCC is the better-named, better-placed and better-populated of the two. By placing Cat:CONCD within Cat:Non-Canonical Doctors, the implication is that they are a subset of Doctors. They're not. They're a subset of Cat:Non-canonical individuals, which is where we find Cat:NCC. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 05:10, April 21, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:10, 21 April 2010
Index → Panopticon → Non-canonical companion categories
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
We have the categories Category:Non-canonical companions and Category:Companions of non-canonical Doctors. Though their meanings can be taken as subtly different, the contents of the latter seem to me as though they'd fit perfectly into the former. Do you suppose we'd benefit from consolidating or nesting the categories, or should we keep them separate? Rob T Firefly 20:19, April 20, 2010 (UTC)
- I've marked the latter to be deleted. Clearly, Cat:NCC is the better-named, better-placed and better-populated of the two. By placing Cat:CONCD within Cat:Non-Canonical Doctors, the implication is that they are a subset of Doctors. They're not. They're a subset of Cat:Non-canonical individuals, which is where we find Cat:NCC. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 05:10, April 21, 2010 (UTC)
