Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
81,877
edits
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
:: I too support this proposal and I hope to see it executed ASAP. As noted, issues such as potential naming disputes can be settled later. [[User:MrThermomanPreacher|MrThermomanPreacher]] [[User talk:MrThermomanPreacher|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:43, 2 January 2023 (UTC) | :: I too support this proposal and I hope to see it executed ASAP. As noted, issues such as potential naming disputes can be settled later. [[User:MrThermomanPreacher|MrThermomanPreacher]] [[User talk:MrThermomanPreacher|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:43, 2 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
::: So, [[User:Najawin]], about CzechOut's comment: I don't actually think we need to worry about the question [[User:TheSpaghetOutcast]] raised, as such. Unlike the ''Curse of Fatal Death'' issue, Czech's post doesn't actually claim to have some personal spin on the question that he hadn't voiced yet: it merely explains where the original decision came from, and says quite clearly that Czech had, by that point, come to view it as unsuitable. What he says is simply this: | |||
{{simplequote|It kinda worked. For a while. Maybe. (…) [But] as of 2021, I think it's fair to say this: we'll be needing to take another look at this whole issue very soon — when the forums have been restored.|User:CzechOut}} | |||
::: And that's exactly what we're doing. Obviously if Czech wants to join it, or if someone wants to devil's-advocate for the old way of doing things, that'd be interesting, but Czech's post makes no demands to wait for him; indeed, quite the opposite. So I think we're fine discussing (and, if it comes to it, closing this) without his point of view in the matter. [[User:OncomingStorm12th|OncomingStorm12th]] [[User talk:OncomingStorm12th|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:10, 2 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
[[Category:Temporary forums]] | [[Category:Temporary forums]] |