1,858
edits
(Added my comment) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit |
(Fixed to be I the support column) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
I completely support this proposal. As said above, we have a great many lists that needs to cover appearances that they at this point do not cover at all. And that’s not even talking about invalid sources. Not much to say, just I support. [[User:Danniesen|Danniesen]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC) | I completely support this proposal. As said above, we have a great many lists that needs to cover appearances that they at this point do not cover at all. And that’s not even talking about invalid sources. Not much to say, just I support. [[User:Danniesen|Danniesen]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
:Personally I think Option 2 is better (because readers SHOULD care if a source is valid or not - even if they don't use those words - otherwise [[T:VS]] is completely useless), and of course agree that invalid sourcss should be covered in lists of apprarances [[User:Cousin Ettolrhc|Cousin Ettolrhc]] [[User talk:Cousin Ettolrhc|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Cousin Ettolrhc | |||
=== Oppose === | === Oppose === | ||
Line 26: | Line 28: | ||
[[Category:Temporary forums]] | [[Category:Temporary forums]] | ||
edits