User talk:Freddy1428: Difference between revisions
Freddy1428 (talk | contribs) (Automatic creation of user pages via script) |
Bongolium500 (talk | contribs) (→Re: Omnipotence: new section) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the [[Tardis:Help| Help pages]], add a question to one of [[Special:Forum|the Forums]] or ask an [[Tardis:Administrators|admin]]. | Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the [[Tardis:Help| Help pages]], add a question to one of [[Special:Forum|the Forums]] or ask an [[Tardis:Administrators|admin]]. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== Re: Omnipotence == | |||
Hi, sorry about taking a while to get back to you. In general, admin talk pages are not the best place to ask questions like this. I would recommend going [https://tardis.fandom.com/f Discussions] in future. To actually answer your questions, I would not consider [[Time Lord]]s to be omnipontent. While in many ways god-like, they do not have complete control over the [[universe]], or even just over [[time]]. If they did, I doubt that the [[War in Heaven]] or the [[Last Great Time War]] would have happened. Why send the [[Fourth Doctor]] to [[Genesis of the Daleks (TV story)|wipe out your enemies]] when you could just do it yourself with your omnipotence? In terms of more powerful beings, possibly the [[Eternal]]s? There may be more that I can't remember. [[User:Bongolium500|<span title="aka Bongolium500">Bongo50</span>]] [[User talk:Bongolium500|<span title="talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:28, 10 February 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:28, 10 February 2023
Thanks for your recent edits! We hope you'll keep on editing with us. This is a great time to have joined us, because now you can play the Game of Rassilon with us and win cool stuff! Well, okay, badges. That have no monetary value. And that largely only you can see. But still: they're cool!
We've got a couple of important quirks for a Fandom wiki, so let's get them out of the way first.
British English, please
We generally use British English 'round these parts, so if you use another form of English, please be sure you set your spell checker to BrEng, and take a gander at our spelling cheat card.
Spoilers aren't cool
We have a strict definition of "spoiler" that you may find a bit unusual. Basically, a spoiler, to us, is anything that comes from a story which has not been released yet. So, even if you've got some info from a BBC press release or official trailer, it basically can't be referenced here. In other words, you gotta wait until the episode has finished its premiere broadcast to start editing about its contents. Please check the spoiler policy for more details.
Other useful stuff
Aside from those two things, we also have some pages that you should probably read when you get a chance, like:
- the listing of all our help, policy and guideline pages
- our Manual of Style
- our image use policy
- our user page policy
If you're brand new to wiki editing — and we all were, once! — you probably want to check out these tutorials at Wikipedia, the world's largest wiki:
Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this:Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask an admin.
Re: Omnipotence
Hi, sorry about taking a while to get back to you. In general, admin talk pages are not the best place to ask questions like this. I would recommend going Discussions in future. To actually answer your questions, I would not consider Time Lords to be omnipontent. While in many ways god-like, they do not have complete control over the universe, or even just over time. If they did, I doubt that the War in Heaven or the Last Great Time War would have happened. Why send the Fourth Doctor to wipe out your enemies when you could just do it yourself with your omnipotence? In terms of more powerful beings, possibly the Eternals? There may be more that I can't remember. Bongo50 ☎ 19:28, 10 February 2023 (UTC)