Forum:Temporary forums/Legacy validity: Difference between revisions

Forum:Temporary forums/Legacy validity (view source)

Revision as of 23:20, 5 March 2023

9 bytes added , 5 March 2023

→‎Discussion

OttselSpy25

Trusted

34,029

edits

Revision as of 23:11, 5 March 2023 (view source) OttselSpy25 (talk \| contribs) (→‎Discussion) Tag: 2017 source edit ← Older edit		Revision as of 23:20, 5 March 2023 (view source) OttselSpy25 (talk \| contribs) (→‎Discussion) Tag: 2017 source edit Newer edit →
Line 117:		Line 117:
	I'm not disputing anything said in the post. I fully believe that OS12 reported the discussion as best they could recall it. (And I fully expect that the reasoning was something ridiculous like that.) It's a procedural qualm. I don't feel comfortable validating ''any'' video game given our extensive discussion of them and continued rejection of them, with all of that discussion taking place in the now gone forums. Other discussions have made me uncomfortable on procedural grounds, but this is just a bit too much for me to support. Again, I think I'm the only person who will feel this way. And I expect that it will be ignored. [[User:Najawin\|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin\|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC)		I'm not disputing anything said in the post. I fully believe that OS12 reported the discussion as best they could recall it. (And I fully expect that the reasoning was something ridiculous like that.) It's a procedural qualm. I don't feel comfortable validating ''any'' video game given our extensive discussion of them and continued rejection of them, with all of that discussion taking place in the now gone forums. Other discussions have made me uncomfortable on procedural grounds, but this is just a bit too much for me to support. Again, I think I'm the only person who will feel this way. And I expect that it will be ignored. [[User:Najawin\|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin\|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

	: I do agree that the lack of any archive of the old Thread:#### system is really a pain, and makes it harder for us to ~~run~~ the site effectively. But at some point, that isn't ''our fault'', and we can't wait around for a proper archive because they likely are never going to come. It's been years since we lost that part of the site, and we can't just refuse to debate any topic which we also talked about between 2012 and 2020. I really do understand that the circumstances aren't ideal, but I disagree that these topics should be discounted. [[User:OttselSpy25\|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25\|🤙☎️]] 23:11, 5 March 2023 (UTC)		: I do agree that the lack of any archive of the old Thread:#### system is really a pain, and makes it harder for us to keep the site running effectively. But at some point, that isn't ''our fault'', and we can't wait around for a proper archive because they likely are never going to come. It's been years since we lost that part of the site, and we can't just refuse to debate any topic which we also talked about between 2012 and 2020. I really do understand that the circumstances aren't ideal, but I disagree that these topics should be discounted. [[User:OttselSpy25\|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25\|🤙☎️]] 23:11, 5 March 2023 (UTC)