1,858
edits
More actions
Forum:Temporary forums/T:BOUND Reform (view source)
Revision as of 15:18, 3 April 2023
, 3 April 2023no edit summary
NateBumber (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
::I don't think there's anything wrong with creating a policy page to describe current practice, as long as the admin doesn't use it to try to change the existing practice in any way. – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 20:48, 27 March 2023 (UTC) | ::I don't think there's anything wrong with creating a policy page to describe current practice, as long as the admin doesn't use it to try to change the existing practice in any way. – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 20:48, 27 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
Coming back to this, I'm not entirely sure how okay I am with granting the ability of saying "That's not current practice" to shut something down. For example, pages like [[Eleventh Doctor's adventures with Alice Obiefune]] are not "current practice" by a certain definition, although this clearly isn't what the thread ''intends'' to codify. For fear of future abuse of this rule by future admins, I think we should phrase this as "don't ''contradict'' current practice" rather than "don't go outside current practice. This may seem painfully obvious and/or pedantic, but I just want to make sure this is how it I codified so as to prevent any possible future exploitative, however unlikely. [[User:Cousin Ettolrhc|Cousin Ettolrahc]] [[User talk:Cousin Ettolrhc|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:18, 3 April 2023 (UTC) | |||