User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20170922234931/@comment-6032121-20181108105956: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
From what Borisashton says in the 3d message, it does seem like it's a narrative; and the previous standard on whether a minisode could be separated from a documentary where they were embedded was whether it made sense on its own, which Borisashton tells us it ''does'' in the last message. | From what Borisashton says in the 3d message, it does seem like it's a narrative; and the previous standard on whether a minisode could be separated from a documentary where they were embedded was whether it made sense on its own, which Borisashton tells us it ''does'' in the last message. | ||
The question, though, that remains, must be whether it's a ''parody'', or just a humorous (but potentially-valid) piece. Why are we hearing the history of the BBC website, exactly? More precisely, does the minisode acknowledge the existence of the show ''Doctor Who'' as one of the things the BBC talks about on said website? If it does, then it can't be anything more than a 4th-wall-breaking parody. If it doesn't, though, I'm in favor of validity. | The question, though, that remains, must be whether it's a ''parody'', or just a humorous (but potentially-valid) piece. Why are we hearing the history of the BBC website, exactly? More precisely, does the minisode acknowledge the existence of the show ''Doctor Who'' as one of the things the BBC talks about on said website? If it does, then it can't be anything more than a 4th-wall-breaking parody. If it doesn't, though, I'm in favor of validity. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170922234931-1432718/20181108105956-6032121]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:27, 27 April 2023
From what Borisashton says in the 3d message, it does seem like it's a narrative; and the previous standard on whether a minisode could be separated from a documentary where they were embedded was whether it made sense on its own, which Borisashton tells us it does in the last message.
The question, though, that remains, must be whether it's a parody, or just a humorous (but potentially-valid) piece. Why are we hearing the history of the BBC website, exactly? More precisely, does the minisode acknowledge the existence of the show Doctor Who as one of the things the BBC talks about on said website? If it does, then it can't be anything more than a 4th-wall-breaking parody. If it doesn't, though, I'm in favor of validity.
