User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200905235227/@comment-45692830-20200910033409: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200905235227/@comment-45692830-20200910033409'''
I don't think that follows. We have Doctor Who spinoffs that aren't covered by this wiki or are ruled invalid. Why would we immediately assume that there's a causal relationship between the validity of "a mainline work"'s validity status and its spinoff works'?
I don't think that follows. We have Doctor Who spinoffs that aren't covered by this wiki or are ruled invalid. Why would we immediately assume that there's a causal relationship between the validity of "a mainline work"'s validity status and its spinoff works'?
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200905235227-1432718/20200910033409-45692830]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 13:31, 27 April 2023

I don't think that follows. We have Doctor Who spinoffs that aren't covered by this wiki or are ruled invalid. Why would we immediately assume that there's a causal relationship between the validity of "a mainline work"'s validity status and its spinoff works'?